ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2023
Ab Initio Molecular Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics Simulations Using Machine Learning Models.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ab Initio Polariton Spectra of ZnTPP Molecules Collectively Coupled Inside an Optical Cavity.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Article
- Perspective on Many-Body Methods for Molecular Polaritonic Systems.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Review
- Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics Complete Active Space Configuration Interaction Theory.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Polaritonic Chemistry: Hindering and Easing Ground State Polyenic Isomerization via Breakdown of σ-π Separation.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2023Article
- Theoretical Advances in Polariton Chemistry and Molecular Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics.Chemical reviews · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a mixed quantum-classical simulation of polariton dynamics for molecule-cavity hybrid systems. In particular, we treat the coupled electronic-photonic degrees of freedom (DOFs) as the quantum subsystem and the nuclear DOFs as the classical subsystem and use the trajectory surface hopping approach to simulate non-adiabatic dynamics among the polariton states due to the coupled motion of nuclei. We use the accurate nuclear gradient expression derived from the Pauli-Fierz quantum electrodynamics Hamiltonian without making further approximations. The energies, gradients, and derivative couplings of the molecular systems are obtained from the on-the-fly simulations at the level of complete active space self-consistent field (CASSCF), which are used to compute the polariton energies and nuclear gradients. The derivatives of dipoles are also necessary ingredients in the polariton nuclear gradient expression but are often not readily available in electronic structure methods. To address this challenge, we use a machine learning model with the Kernel ridge regression method to construct the dipoles and further obtain their derivatives, at the same level as the CASSCF theory. The cavity loss process is modeled with the Lindblad jump superoperator on the reduced density of the electronic-photonic quantum subsystem. We investigate the azomethane molecule and its photoinduced isomerization dynamics inside the cavity. Our results show the accuracy of the machine-learned dipoles and their usage in simulating polariton dynamics. Our polariton dynamics results also demonstrate the isomerization reaction of azomethane can be effectively tuned by coupling to an optical cavity and by changing the light-matter coupling strength and the cavity loss rate.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.