Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37000934›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2023

Item Response Theory Modeling of the Verb Naming Test.

Gerasimos Fergadiotis, Marianne Casilio, Michael Walsh Dickey, Stacey Steel, Hannele Nicholson, Mikala Fleegle, Alexander Swiderski, William D Hula

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gerasimos FergadiotisDepartment of Speech & Hearing Sciences, Portland State University, OR.ORCID 0000-0002-3283-3838
Marianne CasilioDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Michael Walsh DickeyDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-9068-3313
Stacey SteelDepartment of Speech & Hearing Sciences, Portland State University, OR.
Hannele NicholsonU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Minneapolis Healthcare System, MN.
Mikala FleegleDepartment of Speech & Hearing Sciences, Portland State University, OR.
Alexander SwiderskiDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0001-7438-8667
William D HulaDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-1635-0753
Google (United States) · USPortland State University · US

Funding

Assessment of anomia: Improving efficiency and utility using item response theoryR01DC018813 · NIDCD · VETERANS HEALTH FOUNDATION · PI FERGADIOTIS, GERASIMOS, HULA, WILLIAM D. · 2020 to 2024
$2.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeItem response theory (IRT) is a modern psychometric framework with several advantageous properties as compared with classical test theory. IRT has been successfully used to model performance on anomia tests in individuals with aphasia; however, all efforts to date have focused on noun production accuracy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the Verb Naming Test (VNT), a prominent test of action naming, can be successfully modeled under IRT and evaluate its reliability.

methodWe used responses on the VNT from 107 individuals with chronic aphasia from AphasiaBank. Unidimensionality and local independence, two assumptions prerequisite to IRT modeling, were evaluated using factor analysis and Yen's

resultsThe VNT was found to be sufficiently unidimensional with the majority of item pairs demonstrating adequate local independence. An IRT model in which item discriminations are constrained to be equal demonstrated fit equivalent to a model in which unique discrimination parameters were estimated for each item. All forms of reliability were strong across the majority of IRT ability estimates.

conclusionsModeling the VNT using IRT is feasible, yielding ability estimates that are both informative and reliable. Future efforts are needed to quantify the validity of the VNT under IRT and determine the extent to which it measures the same construct as other anomia tests. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.22329235.

Indexed as

AnomiaFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID37000934
PMCPMC10457085
OpenAlexW4362459100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.