Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37000890›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Acceptability and perceived barriers to reactive focal mass drug administration in the context of a malaria elimination program in Magude district, Southern Mozambique: A qualitative study.

Carlos Eduardo Cuinhane, Beatriz Galatas, Julia Montaña Lopez, Helder Djive, Hoticha Nhantumbo, Ilda Murato, Francisco Saúte, Pedro Aide, Khátia Munguambe, Neusa Torres

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlos Eduardo CuinhaneDepartment of Sociology, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique.
Beatriz GalatasCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique.
Julia Montaña LopezCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique.
Helder DjiveCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique.
Hoticha NhantumboCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique.
Ilda MuratoCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique.
Francisco SaúteCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique.
Pedro AideCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique.
Khátia MunguambeISGlobal, Hospital Clinic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Neusa TorresCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique.
Manhiça Health Research Centre · MZUniversitat de Barcelona · ESEduardo Mondlane University · MZMinistry of Health · MZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study analysed acceptability and perceived barriers to reactive focal mass drug administration (rfMDA) among community members exposed to community engagement campaigns and malaria elimination interventions in Magude district, following mass drug administration (MDA) in the same district. The study used a formative qualitative study design, consisting of 56 semi-structured interviews with community members, including community leaders, household heads, women of reproductive age, members of the community and adolescents, 4 semi-structured interviews with community health workers, 9 semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals; and 16 focus group discussions with the general adult population. Data were collected between June and September 2017. A content thematic analysis approach was used to analyse the data. The results of this study showed that rfMDA was accepted due to awareness about the intervention, experience of a previous similar programme, the MDA campaign, and due to favourable perceptions built on the believe that rfMDA would help to prevent, treat and eliminate malaria in the community. Perceived barriers to rfMDA include lack of access to accurate information, reluctance to take a pregnancy test, concern on drug adverse reactions, and reluctance to take antimalarial drugs without any symptom. In conclusion, the community found rfMDA acceptable for malaria intervention. But more community engagement is needed to foster community involvement and self-appropriation of the malaria programme elimination.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsMalariaAdolescentAdultCommunity Health WorkersFemaleHumansMass Drug AdministrationMozambiqueAntimalarials

Identifiers

PMID37000890
PMCPMC10065238
OpenAlexW4362475510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.