Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37000839›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Predicting a diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis using primary care health records-A machine learning approach.

Jonathan Kennedy, Natasha Kennedy, Roxanne Cooksey, Ernest Choy, Stefan Siebert, Muhammad Rahman, Sinead Brophy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Interpretable Machine Learning for Predicting Anterior Uveitis in Axial Spondyloarthritis.Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan KennedyData Science Building, Swansea University, Wales, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1122-6502
Natasha KennedyData Science Building, Swansea University, Wales, United Kingdom.
Roxanne CookseyData Science Building, Swansea University, Wales, United Kingdom.
Ernest ChoyCREATE Centre, Section of Rheumatology, Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Stefan SiebertInstitute of Infection Immunity & Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1802-7311
Muhammad RahmanData Science Building, Swansea University, Wales, United Kingdom.
Sinead BrophyData Science Building, Swansea University, Wales, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7417-2858
Swansea University · GBCardiff University · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S004084/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ankylosing spondylitis is the second most common cause of inflammatory arthritis. However, a successful diagnosis can take a decade to confirm from symptom onset (via x-rays). The aim of this study was to use machine learning methods to develop a profile of the characteristics of people who are likely to be given a diagnosis of AS in future. The Secure Anonymised Information Linkage databank was used. Patients with ankylosing spondylitis were identified using their routine data and matched with controls who had no record of a diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis or axial spondyloarthritis. Data was analysed separately for men and women. The model was developed using feature/variable selection and principal component analysis to develop decision trees. The decision tree with the highest average F value was selected and validated with a test dataset. The model for men indicated that lower back pain, uveitis, and NSAID use under age 20 is associated with AS development. The model for women showed an older age of symptom presentation compared to men with back pain and multiple pain relief medications. The models showed good prediction (positive predictive value 70%-80%) in test data but in the general population where prevalence is very low (0.09% of the population in this dataset) the positive predictive value would be very low (0.33%-0.25%). Machine learning can be used to help profile and understand the characteristics of people who will develop AS, and in test datasets with artificially high prevalence, will perform well. However, when applied to a general population with low prevalence rates, such as that in primary care, the positive predictive value for even the best model would be 1.4%. Multiple models may be needed to narrow down the population over time to improve the predictive value and therefore reduce the time to diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis.

Indexed as

ArthritisSpondylitis, AnkylosingAdultBack PainFemaleHumansMachine LearningMalePrimary Health CareYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID37000839
PMCPMC10065228
OpenAlexW4362473623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.