Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37000805›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Targeting earlier diagnosis: What symptoms come first in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy?

Colin F Munro, Ratko Yurac, Zipser Carl Moritz, Michael G Fehlings, Ricardo Rodrigues-Pinto, James Milligan, Konstantinos Margetis, Mark R N Kotter, Benjamin M Davies

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Understanding degenerative cervical myelopathy in musculoskeletal practice.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Colin F MunroDivision of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7235-3970
Ratko YuracDepartment of Traumatology, Spine Unit, Clinica Alemana de Santiago SA, Vitacura, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-3603-6294
Zipser Carl MoritzUniversity Spine Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Michael G FehlingsDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ricardo Rodrigues-PintoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Spinal Unit (UVM), Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto EPE, Porto, Portugal.
James MilliganMcMaster University Department of Family Medicine, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Konstantinos MargetisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, United States of America.
Mark R N KotterDivision of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.
Benjamin M DaviesDivision of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0591-5069
University of Cambridge · GBMcMaster University · CAMount Sinai Hospital · USUniversidad del Desarrollo · CLUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversitätsklinik Balgrist · CHUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDegenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a common and disabling condition. Early effective treatment is limited by late diagnosis. Conventional descriptions of DCM focus on motor and sensory limb disability, however, recent work suggests the true impact is much broader. This study aimed to characterise the symptomatic presentation of DCM from the perspective of people with DCM and determine whether any of the reported symptoms, or groups of symptoms, were associated with early diagnosis.

methodsAn internet survey was developed, using an established list of patient-reported effects. Participants (N = 171) were recruited from an online community of people with DCM. Respondents selected their current symptoms and primary presenting symptom. The relationship of symptoms and their relationship to time to diagnosis were explored. This included symptoms not commonly measured today, termed 'non-conventional' symptoms.

resultsAll listed symptoms were experienced by >10% of respondents, with poor balance being the most commonly reported (84.2%). Non-conventional symptoms accounted for 39.7% of symptomatic burden. 55.4% of the symptoms were reported as an initial symptom, with neck pain the most common (13.5%). Non-conventional symptoms accounted for 11.1% of initial symptoms. 79.5% of the respondents were diagnosed late (>6 months). Heavy legs was the only initial symptom associated with early diagnosis.

conclusionsA comprehensive description of the self-reported effects of DCM has been established, including the prevalence of symptoms at disease presentation. The experience of DCM is broader than suggested by conventional descriptions and further exploration of non-conventional symptoms may support earlier diagnosis.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeSpinal Cord DiseasesDelayed DiagnosisHumansNeckNeck Pain

Identifiers

PMID37000805
PMCPMC10065274
OpenAlexW4362472336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.