Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37000787›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Comparing the salinity tolerance of twenty different wheat genotypes on the basis of their physiological and biochemical parameters under NaCl stress.

Amaneh Ghasemi Masarmi, M Solouki, B Fakheri, Hazem M Kalaji, N Mahgdingad, S Golkari, Arkadiusz Telesiński, Sobhi F Lamlom, Henryk Kociel, Ahmed Fathy Yousef

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
17.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Amaneh Ghasemi MasarmiPlant Breeding- Genetic Biometric, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran.
M SoloukiFaculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran.
B FakheriFaculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran.
Hazem M KalajiDepartment of Plant Physiology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences SGGW, Warsaw, Poland.
N MahgdingadFaculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran.
S GolkariAgriculture Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Dryland Agriculture Research Institute (DARI), Maragheh, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-3092-6328
Arkadiusz TelesińskiDepartment of Bioengineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Sobhi F LamlomFaculty of Agriculture Saba Basha, Plant Production Department, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-5003-9275
Henryk KocielFirma Usługowa Ogród, Maria Kociel, Łuków, Poland.
Ahmed Fathy YousefDepartment of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, University of Al-Azhar (Branch Assiut), Assiut, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-6614-5566
Zabol University · IRAgricultural Research & Education Organization · IRAlexandria University · EGAssiut University · EGWarsaw University of Life Sciences · PLWest Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The climate has drastically changed over the past two decades. Rising temperatures and climate change may lead to increased evapotranspiration, specifically soil evaporation, causing water to evaporate and salt to accumulate in the soil, resulting in increased soil salinity. As a result, there is a need to evaluate methods for predicting and monitoring the effects of salinity on crop growth and production through rapid screening. Our study was conducted on 20 wheat genotypes, 10 sensitive and 10 tolerant, exposed to two salinity levels (90 and 120 mM NaCl) with the control under greenhouse conditions. Our results revealed significant differences in the genotypes' response to salinity. Salt stress decreased chlorophyll index in sensitive genotypes but increased chlorophyll a and carotenoids in tolerant genotypes at 90 mM. Salt stress also increased protein, proline, lipoxygenase, and reactive thiobarbituric acid levels in all wheat genotypes. The study suggests that plant photosynthetic efficiency is a reliable, non-destructive biomarker for determining the salt tolerance of wheat genotypes, while other biochemical traits are destructive and time-consuming and therefore not suitable for rapid screening.

Indexed as

Salt ToleranceTriticumChlorophyll AGenotypeSalinitySodium ChlorideSoilStress, PhysiologicalChlorophyll ASodium ChlorideSoil

Identifiers

PMID37000787
PMCPMC10065278
OpenAlexW4362467352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.