Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37000706›Full record

ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2023

Econometric evaluation of implementing a behavioral health integration intervention in primary care settings.

Zsolt Nagykaldi, Benjamin Littenberg, Levi Bonnell, Ryan Breshears, Jessica Clifton, Abigail Crocker, Juvena Hitt, Rodger Kessler, Brenda Mollis, Robin E S Miyamoto and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Zsolt NagykaldiDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1239-6164
Benjamin LittenbergDepartment of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Levi BonnellDepartment of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Ryan BreshearsPsychological Services, Wellstar Health System, Marietta, GA, USA.
Jessica CliftonUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, USA.
Abigail CrockerDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Juvena HittDepartment of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Rodger KesslerIntegrated Behavioral Health, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Brenda MollisDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Robin E S MiyamotoDepartments of Native Hawaiian Health and Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Constance van EeghenDepartment of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
University of Vermont · USArizona State University · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USUniversity of Washington · USWellStar Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrated behavioral health (IBH) is an approach to patient care that brings medical and behavioral health providers (BHPs) together to address both behavioral and medical needs within primary care settings. A large, pragmatic, national study aimed to test the effectiveness and measure the implementation costs of an intervention to improve IBH integration within primary care practices (IBH-PC). Assess the time and cost to practices of implementing a comprehensive practice-level intervention designed from the perspective of clinic owners to move behavioral service integration from co-location toward full integration as part of the IBH-PC study. IBH-PC program implementation costs were estimated in a representative sample of 8 practices using standard micro-econometric evaluation of activities outlined in the implementation workbook, including program implementation tasks, remote quality improvement coaching services, educational curricula, and learning community activities, over a 24-month period. The total median cost of implementing the IBH-PC program across all stages was $20,726 (range: $12,381 - $60,427). The median cost of the Planning Stage was $10,258 (range: $4,625 - $14,840), while the median cost of the Implementation Stage was $9,208 (range: $6,017 - 49,993). There were no statistically significant differences in practice or patient characteristics between the 8 selected practices and the larger IBH-PC practice sample (N=34). This study aimed to quantify the relative costs associated with integrating behavioral health into primary care. Although the cost assessment approach did not include all costs (fixed, variable, operational, and opportunity costs), the study aimed to develop a replicable and pragmatic measurement process with flexibility to adapt to emerging developments in each practice environment, providing a reasonable ballpark estimate of costs associated with implementation to help guide future executive decisions.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyLearningHumansPrimary Health CareBehavioral health integrationCost analysisPrimary careProgram implementation

Identifiers

PMID37000706
PMCPMC10415735
OpenAlexW4362457828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.