Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37000596›Full record

Trial reportJournal of behavioral addictions2023

Efficacy of a novel online integrated treatment for problem gambling and tobacco smoking: Results of a randomized controlled trial.

Van Bui, Christian Baumgartner, Elena Bilevicius, Alanna Single, Lana Vedelago, Vanessa Morris, Tyler Kempe, Michael P Schaub, Sherry H Stewart, James MacKillop and 9 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Van Bui1Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Canada.
Christian Baumgartner2Swiss Research Institute for Public Health and Addiction, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Elena Bilevicius1Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Canada.
Alanna Single1Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Canada.
Lana Vedelago3Department of Psychology, York University, Canada.
Vanessa Morris14Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Canada.
Tyler Kempe1Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Canada.
Michael P Schaub2Swiss Research Institute for Public Health and Addiction, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Sherry H Stewart4Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology & Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Canada.
James MacKillop5Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research McMaster University/St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Canada.
David C Hodgins6Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Canada.
Jeffrey D Wardell3Department of Psychology, York University, Canada.
Rosin O'Connor7Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Canada.
Jennifer Read8Department of Psychology, University of Buffalo, USA.
Heather D Hadjistavropoulos9Department of Psychology, University of Regina, Canada.
Christopher Sundström10Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sarah Dermody11Department of Psychology, Ryerson University, Canada.
Andrew H Kim11Department of Psychology, Ryerson University, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0804-0256
Matthew T Keough1Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Problem gambling and tobacco use are highly comorbid among adults. However, there are few treatment frameworks that target both gambling and tobacco use simultaneously (i.e., an integrated approach), while also being accessible and evidence-based. The aim of this two-arm open label RCT was to examine the efficacy of an integrated online treatment for problem gambling and tobacco use. Methods: A sample of 209 participants (Mage = 37.66, SD = 13.81; 62.2% female) from North America were randomized into one of two treatment conditions (integrated [n = 91] or gambling only [n = 118]) that lasted for eight weeks and consisted of seven online modules. Participants completed assessments at baseline, after treatment completion, and at 24-week follow-up. Results: While a priori planned generalized linear mixed models showed no condition differences on primary (gambling days, money spent, time spent) and secondary outcomes, both conditions did appear to significantly reduce problem gambling and smoking behaviours over time. Post hoc analyses showed that reductions in smoking and gambling craving were correlated with reductions in days spent gambling, as well as with gambling disorder symptoms. Relatively high (versus low) nicotine replacement therapy use was associated with greater reductions in gambling behaviours in the integrated treatment condition. Discussion and conclusions: While our open label RCT does not support a clear benefit of integrated treatment, findings suggest that changes in smoking and gambling were correlated over time, regardless of treatment condition, suggesting that more research on mechanisms of smoking outcomes in the context of gambling treatment may be relevant.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyGamblingSmoking CessationAdultFemaleHumansMaleTobacco SmokingTobacco Use Cessation Devicescognitive behavioural therapyintegrated treatmentmotivational interviewingonlineproblem gamblingself-helptobacco smoking

Identifiers

PMID37000596
PMCPMC10260216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.