ArticleThe British journal of radiology2023
Inter-rater agreement between radiologists using the novel CT-TDV (T3c+; tumour deposits; EMVI) system in patients with potentially curable right colon cancer.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- CT-based radiogenomic analysis to predict high-risk colon cancer (ATTRACT): a multicentric trial.European radiology · 2025Trial
- Assessing the role of CT imaging in identifying candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in right colon cancer: a critical analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- Impact of hospital volume on survival in patients with locally advanced colon cancer - A Dutch population-based study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025Article
- Performance of CT in the locoregional staging of colon cancer: detailed radiology-pathology correlation with special emphasis on tumor deposits, extramural venous invasion and T staging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe novel CT-TDV scoring system, identifying T3
methodsNinety-three right colon cancer pre-operative CT scans were graded as CT TDV "good" versus TDV "poor" by four radiologists. Inter-rater agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between all four readers and individual readers against the central radiologist using Cohen's κ statistic.
resultsThe ICC comparing those graded as TDV "good" versus TDV "poor" for all 93 cases was 0.61 (0.51-0.70) indicating moderate reliability. Individual κ scores across the 93 cases were 0.76, 0.59 and 0.59 (
conclusionThe CT TDV scoring system is reproducible amongst trained gastrointestinal radiologists in the assessment of newly diagnosed right colon cancer. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This further validates the clinical utility of the CT TDV scoring system as a prognostic tool to guide the management of patients with potentially curable right colon cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.