Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37000452›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2023

Effect of Disulfiram and Copper Plus Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy Alone on Survival in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Katja Werlenius, Sara Kinhult, Tora Skeidsvoll Solheim, Henriette Magelssen, David Löfgren, Munila Mudaisi, Sofia Hylin, Jiri Bartek, Michael Strandéus, Magnus Lindskog and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02678975 (DIRECT), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02678975 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

DIRECT (DIsulfiram REsponse as add-on to ChemoTherapy in Recurrent) Glioblastoma: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSahlgrenska University HospitalRan2017 to 2021Enrolled88ConditionsGlioma, GlioblastomaArmsDisulfiram, Copper, Alkylating Agents
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Role of Ferredoxin 1Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Katja WerleniusDepartment of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sara KinhultDepartment of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Tora Skeidsvoll SolheimDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Henriette MagelssenDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
David LöfgrenDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Munila MudaisiDepartment of Oncology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Sofia HylinDepartment of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jiri BartekDepartment of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Michael StrandéusDepartment of Oncology, County Hospital Ryhov, Jönköping, Sweden.
Magnus LindskogDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Havyan Bahroz RashidSahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Louise CarstamDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sasha GulatiDepartment of Neurosurgery, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Ole SolheimDepartment of Neurosurgery, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Jiri BartekDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Division of Genome Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Øyvind SalvesenDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Asgeir Store JakolaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SENorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOSt Olav's University Hospital · NOLinköping University Hospital · SELund University · SEÖrebro University · SEOslo University Hospital · NORyhov Hospital Jönköping · SESahlgrenska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Disulfiram has demonstrated broad antitumoral effect in several preclinical studies. One of the proposed indications is for the treatment of glioblastoma. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of disulfiram and copper as add-on to alkylating chemotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase II/III clinical trial with parallel group design. Patients were recruited at 7 study sites in Sweden and 2 sites in Norway between January 2017 and November 2020. Eligible patients were 18 years or older, had a first recurrence of glioblastoma, and indication for treatment with alkylating chemotherapy. Patients were followed up until death or a maximum of 24 months. The date of final follow-up was January 15, 2021. Data analysis was performed from February to September 2022. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either standard-of-care (SOC) alkylating chemotherapy alone, or SOC with the addition of disulfiram (400 mg daily) and copper (2.5 mg daily). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was survival at 6 months. Secondary end points included overall survival, progression-free survival, adverse events, and patient-reported quality of life. Results: Among the 88 patients randomized to either SOC (n = 45) or SOC plus disulfiram and copper (n = 43), 63 (72%) were male; the mean (SD) age was 55.4 (11.5) years. There was no significant difference between the study groups (SOC vs SOC plus disulfiram and copper) in 6 months survival (62% [26 of 42] vs 44% [19 of 43]; P = .10). Median overall survival was 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.4-10.2 months) with SOC and 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.9-9.3 months) with SOC plus disulfiram and copper, and median progression-free survival was 2.6 months (95% CI, 2.4-4.6 months) vs 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.7-2.6 months), respectively. More patients in the SOC plus disulfiram and copper group had adverse events grade 3 or higher (34% [14 of 41] vs 11% [5 of 44]; P = .02) and serious adverse events (41% [17 of 41] vs 16% [7 of 44]; P = .02), and 10 patients (24%) discontinued disulfiram treatment because of adverse effects. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that among patients with recurrent glioblastoma, the addition of disulfiram and copper to chemotherapy, compared with chemotherapy alone, resulted in significantly increased toxic effects, but no significant difference in survival. These findings suggest that disulfiram and copper is without benefit in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02678975; EUDRACT Identifier: 2016-000167-16.

Indexed as

GlioblastomaAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCopperDisulfiramFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeCopperDisulfiram

Identifiers

PMID37000452
PMCPMC10066460
OpenAlexW4362472887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.