Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37000332›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2023

The Use of Artificial Intelligence to Predict the Development of Atrial Fibrillation.

Daniel Pipilas, Samuel Freesun Friedman, Shaan Khurshid

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [Prediction method of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation based on multimodal feature fusion].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel PipilasCardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Samuel Freesun FriedmanCardiovascular Disease Initiative, Broad Institute of Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Shaan KhurshidCardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. skhurshid@partners.org.ORCID 0000-0002-2840-4539
Broad Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAtrial fibrillation (AF) is a major public health problem associated with preventable morbidity. Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as potential tool to prioritize individuals at increased risk for AF for preventive interventions. This review summarizes recent advances in the use of AI models to estimate AF risk. RECENT

findingsSeveral AI-enabled models have been recently developed which can discriminate AF risk with reasonable accuracy. AI models utilizing the electrocardiogram waveform appear to extract predictive information which is additive beyond traditional clinical risk factors. By identifying individuals at higher risk for AF, AI-based models may improve the efficiency of preventive efforts (e.g., screening, risk factor modification) intended to reduce risk of AF and associated morbidity.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationArtificial IntelligenceElectrocardiographyHumansPublic HealthRisk FactorsArtificial intelligenceAtrial fibrillationMachine learningRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID37000332
PMCPMC10064630
OpenAlexW4362506970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.