ReviewNeurosurgical review2023
Emerging trends and research foci of deep learning in spine: bibliometric and visualization study.
Review in Neurosurgical review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Demystifying machine learning approaches in digital bone imaging using microCT and HRpQCT.Bone reports · 2026Review
- Advent of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Research: An Updated Perspective.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Global Research Hotspots and Trends in Advances of the Ilizarov Technique: A Bibliometric Mapping.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Review
- Deep learning based decision-making and outcome prediction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with posterior surgery.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Evolution of Pediatric Spine Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications From 1902 to 2023.Neurosurgery practice · 2024Article
- Revolutionizing Spinal Care: Current Applications and Future Directions of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the cognition of spine develops, deep learning (DL) emerges as a powerful tool with tremendous potential for advancing research in this field. To provide a comprehensive overview of DL-spine research, our study utilized bibliometric and visual methods to retrieve relevant articles from the Web of Science database. VOSviewer and CiteSpace were primarily used for literature measurement and knowledge graph analysis. A total of 273 studies focusing on deep learning in the spine, with a combined total of 2302 citations, were retrieved. Additionally, the overall number of articles published on this topic demonstrated a continuous upward trend. China was the country with the highest number of publications, whereas the USA had the most citations. The two most prominent journals were "European Spine Journal" and "Medical Image Analysis," and the most involved research area was Radiology Nuclear Medicine Medical Imaging. VOSviewer identified three visually distinct clusters: "segmentation," "area," and "neural network." Meanwhile, CiteSpace highlighted "magnetic resonance image" and "lumbar" as the keywords with the longest usage, and "agreement" and "automated detection" as the most commonly used keywords. Although the application of DL in spine is still in its infancy, its future is promising. Intercontinental cooperation, extensive application, and more interpretable algorithms will invigorate DL in the field of spine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37000304What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.