Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37000256›Full record

ArticleSurgery today2023

Characteristics and distribution of chronic pain after mastectomy and breast reconstruction: a long-term prospective cohort study.

Makoto Shiraishi, Yoshihiro Sowa, Itaru Tsuge, Akiko Shiraishi, Naoki Inafuku, Naoki Morimoto, Ichiro Nakayama

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery today, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Makoto ShiraishiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3734-2085
Yoshihiro SowaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan. ysowawan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7112-1630
Itaru TsugeDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyou-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Akiko ShiraishiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Naoki InafukuDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Naoki MorimotoDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyou-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Ichiro NakayamaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Kyoto Miniren Chuo Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Kyoto University · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPMie University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChronic pain following breast surgery is a concern for breast cancer survivors; however, few studies have investigated the localization of persistent postoperative pain. We conducted this study to identify the location of pain following breast reconstruction.

methodsA total of 213 Japanese women undergoing mastectomy only or breast reconstruction with a tissue expander/implant (TE/Imp) or a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap were enrolled in the study. Questionnaires related to pain location were sent to patients at the end of postoperative year (POY) 1 and POY 5. Multiple comparisons of the types of operation and cross-tabulation were made between the two time points.

resultsSurveys were completed by 107 of the women. Severe pain in the upper medial breast was significantly more common in POY 1 after DIEP reconstruction than after mastectomy only (P = 0.01), whereas abdominal pain was worse in POY 5 after DIEP reconstruction than after mastectomy only (P = 0.04). Pain in the medial arm and axilla had resolved better after TE/Imp (P = 0.03) and DIEP reconstruction (P = 0.01) than after mastectomy only by POY 5, but the difference between TE/Imp and DIEP reconstruction was not significant.

conclusionsThese results show that localization of prolonged postoperative pain following breast reconstruction differs depending on the surgical strategy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsChronic PainMammaplastyPerforator FlapFemaleHumansMastectomyPostoperative PainProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesBreast implantBreast reconstructionChronic postoperative painDeep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flapTissue expander

Identifiers

PMID37000256
OpenAlexW4362458496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.