Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37000233›Full record

ArticleJournal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie2024

Effect of orthodontic extraction of mandibular premolars on third molar angulation after treatment with fixed appliances : A cross-sectional study.

Tamara Di Giovanni, Theodosia Vogiatzi, Vasiliki Koretsi, Tanya Walsh, Nick Silikas, Spyridon N Papageorgiou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effect of orthodontic extraction of mandibular premolars on third molar angulation after treatment with fixed appliances : A cross-sectional study.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tamara Di GiovanniClinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Plattenstr. 11, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland.
Theodosia VogiatziDivision of Dentistry, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Vasiliki KoretsiClinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Plattenstr. 11, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8416-6523
Tanya WalshDivision of Dentistry, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7003-8854
Nick SilikasDivision of Dentistry, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4576-4584
Spyridon N PapageorgiouClinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Plattenstr. 11, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland. snpapage@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1968-3326

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOrthodontic treatment involving premolar extractions might improve the angulation of lower third molars, which are the teeth most often impacted. This study analyzes the impact of first/second lower premolar extraction during orthodontic therapy on the angulation of mandibular third molars.

methodsA total of 120 patients treated non-extraction (n = 40), with extraction of first (n = 40), or second lower premolars (n = 40) were included. The mesiodistal angulation of lower third molars relative to the adjacent tooth and their developmental stage were evaluated from posttreatment orthopantomograms. Between-group differences were statistically evaluated at a significance level of 0.05.

resultsThe orthopantomograms of 120 patients (51% female) with a median age of 15.2 years at the time of debonding were evaluated after a mean treatment duration time of 2.9 years. No difference (P > 0.05) was seen between the average angulation of the lower third molars of the right (mean = 24.4°, standard deviation [SD] 13.6°) and the left side (mean = 23.6°, SD 14.1°). No differences in the angulation of the lower third molar were found between the non-extraction and extraction groups for the right (P = 0.44) or the left side (P = 0.22). Likewise, no differences were found when comparing the first and second premolars for the right (P = 0.26) or the left side (P = 0.10). Premolar extraction was associated with an advanced root development stage of the right third molar (odds ratio 7.1; 95% confidence interval 1.1-48.1; P = 0.04), with no differences between extraction of the first or second premolar (P = 0.10).

conclusionOrthodontic treatment involving premolars extractions might be associated with a small acceleration in root development, but not with the angulation, of lower third molars.

Indexed as

BicuspidMolar, ThirdTooth ExtractionAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMandibleOrthodontic Appliances, FixedRadiography, PanoramicRisk FactorsTooth, ImpactedTreatment OutcomeImpacted toothOrthodontic treatmentPremolar extractionRetrospective cross-sectional studyThird molars

Identifiers

PMID37000233
PMCPMC11496369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.