ArticleClinical neuroradiology2024
Diagnosis of Small Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms : Comparison of 7 T versus 3 T MRI.
Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence for Cerebral Aneurysm Management: Integrating Imaging, Hemodynamics, and Clinical Decision Support.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Cerebrovascular Imaging: A Targeted Review of Aneurysm Detection and Rupture Risk Prediction.JMA journal · 2026Review
- Diagnosis of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Using Proton-Density Magnetic Resonance Angiography: A Comparison With High-Resolution Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography.Korean journal of radiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDifferentiating normal anatomical variants such as an infundibulum or a vascular loop from true intracranial aneurysms is crucial for patient management. We hypothesize that high-resolution 7 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) improves the detection and characterization of normal anatomical variants that may otherwise be misdiagnosed as small unruptured aneurysms.
methodsThis is a retrospective, single-center study. All patients were scanned on a clinically approved 7 T MRI scanner and on a 3 T scanner. Image analysis was performed independently by three neuroradiologists blinded to clinical information. The presence of an unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) and level of diagnostic certainty were assessed and the interrater agreement was calculated. If an aneurysm was present, the anatomic location and shape were recorded and compared.
resultsIn total, 53 patients with equivocal cerebrovascular findings on 1.5 T or 3 T MRI referred for a 7T MRI examination were included. Aneurysms were suspected in 42 patients examined at 3 T and in 23 patients at 7 T (rate difference 36%, 95% confidence interval, CI, 19-53%, p-value < 0.001). Major disagreement between the field strengths was observed in the A1 segment of anterior cerebral artery/anterior communicating artery (A1/ACOM) complex. The interrater agreement among the readers on the presence of an aneurysm on 7 T MRI was higher than that for 3 T MRI (0.925, 95% CI 0.866-0.983 vs. 0.786, 95% CI 0.700-0.873).
conclusionOur analysis demonstrates a significantly higher interrater agreement and improved diagnostic certainty when small intracranial aneurysms are visualized on 7 T MRI compared to 3 T. In a selected patient cohort, clinical implementation of 7 T MRI may help to establish the definitive diagnosis and thus have a beneficial impact on patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.