Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36999625›Full record

ArticleOncology reports2023

Development and characterization of a patient‑derived orthotopic xenograft of therapy‑resistant breast cancer.

Ramesh Butti, Prachi Kapse, Garima Bhadauriya, Suhail Ahmad, Rohan Chaubal, Pallavi Parab, Rasika Kadam, Soumya S Mahapatra, Tanuja Shet, Amit Dutt and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ramesh ButtiLaboratory of Tumor Biology, Angiogenesis and Nanomedicine Research, National Centre for Cell Science, Pune, Maharashtra 411007, India.
Prachi KapseLaboratory of Tumor Biology, Angiogenesis and Nanomedicine Research, National Centre for Cell Science, Pune, Maharashtra 411007, India.
Garima BhadauriyaLaboratory of Tumor Biology, Angiogenesis and Nanomedicine Research, National Centre for Cell Science, Pune, Maharashtra 411007, India.
Suhail AhmadIntegrated Cancer Genomics Laboratory, Tata Memorial Centre‑Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (TMC‑ACTREC), Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra 410210, India.
Rohan ChaubalHomi Bhabha National Institute, Training School Complex, Mumbai 400094, India.
Pallavi ParabHomi Bhabha National Institute, Training School Complex, Mumbai 400094, India.
Rasika KadamClinical Genomics and Hypoxia Lab (Clinician Scientist Lab), TMC‑ACTREC, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra 410210, India.
Soumya S MahapatraSchool of Biotechnology, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751024, India.
Tanuja ShetHomi Bhabha National Institute, Training School Complex, Mumbai 400094, India.
Amit DuttIntegrated Cancer Genomics Laboratory, Tata Memorial Centre‑Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (TMC‑ACTREC), Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra 410210, India.
Sudeep GuptaHomi Bhabha National Institute, Training School Complex, Mumbai 400094, India.
Gopal C KunduLaboratory of Tumor Biology, Angiogenesis and Nanomedicine Research, National Centre for Cell Science, Pune, Maharashtra 411007, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous years of cell line‑based studies have enhanced the current understanding of cancer and its treatment. However, limited success has been achieved in treating hormone receptor‑positive, HER2‑negative metastatic breast cancers that are refractory to treatment. The majority of cancer cell lines are unsuitable for use as pre‑clinical models that mimic this critical and often fatal clinical type, since they are derived from treatment‑naive or non‑metastatic breast cancer cases. The aim of the present study was to develop and characterize patient‑derived orthotopic xenografts (PDOXs) from patients with endocrine hormone receptor‑positive, HER2‑negative metastatic breast cancer who had relapsed on therapy. A patient who progressed on endocrine hormone therapy provided her tumor via a biobank. This tumor was implanted in mice. It was then serially passaged by implanting PDOX tumor fragments into another set of mice to develop further generations of PDOXs. These tissues were characterized using various histological and biochemical techniques. Histological, immunofluorescence and western blot analyses indicated that the PDOX tumors retained a similar morphology, histology and subtype‑specific molecular features to that of the patient's tumor. The present study successfully established PDOXs of hormone‑resistant breast cancer and characterized them in comparison with those derived from the original breast cancer tissue of the patient. The data highlight the reliability and usefulness of PDOX models for studies of biomarker discovery and preclinical drug screening. The present study was registered with the clinical trial registry of India (CTRI; registration no. CTRI/2017/11/010553; registered on 17/11/2017).

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAnimalsFemaleHeterograftsHormonesHumansMiceReproducibility of ResultsXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysHormonesbiomarkerbreast cancerestrogen receptor‑αHER2patient‑derived orthotopic xenograftprogesterone receptor‑α

Identifiers

PMID36999625
PMCPMC10091080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.