Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36999559›Full record

ReviewDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2023

A review of the International Seabed Authority database DeepData from a biological perspective: challenges and opportunities in the UN Ocean Decade.

M Rabone, T Horton, D O B Jones, E Simon-Lledó, A G Glover

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Complex deep-sea expeditions try to size up seabed mining impacts.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M RaboneDeep-Sea Systematics and Ecology Research Group, Life Sciences Department, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Rd, London SW7 5BD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8351-2313
T HortonOcean Biogeosciences, National Oceanography Centre, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4250-1068
D O B JonesOcean Biogeosciences, National Oceanography Centre, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5218-1649
E Simon-LledóOcean Biogeosciences, National Oceanography Centre, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9667-2917
A G GloverDeep-Sea Systematics and Ecology Research Group, Life Sciences Department, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Rd, London SW7 5BD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9489-074X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an urgent need for high-quality biodiversity data in the context of rapid environmental change. Nowhere is this need more urgent than in the deep ocean, with the possibility of seabed mining moving from exploration to exploitation, but where vast knowledge gaps persist. Regions of the seabed beyond national jurisdiction, managed by the International Seabed Authority (ISA), are undergoing intensive mining exploration, including the Clarion-Clipperton Zone (CCZ) in the Central Pacific. In 2019, the ISA launched its database 'DeepData', publishing environmental (including biological) data. Here, we explore how DeepData could support biological research and environmental policy development in the CCZ (and wider ocean regions) and whether data are findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (FAIR). Given the direct connection of DeepData with the regulator of a rapidly developing potential industry, this review is particularly timely. We found evidence of extensive duplication of datasets; an absence of unique record identifiers and significant taxonomic data-quality issues, compromising FAIRness of the data. The publication of DeepData records on the OBIS ISA node in 2021 has led to large-scale improvements in data quality and accessibility. However, limitations in the usage of identifiers and issues with taxonomic information were also evident in datasets published on the node, stemming from mismapping of data from the ISA environmental data template to the data standard Darwin Core prior to data harvesting by OBIS. While notable data-quality issues remain, these changes signal a rapid evolution for the database and significant movement towards integrating with global systems, through the usage of data standards and publication on the global data aggregator OBIS. This is exactly what has been needed for biological datasets held by the ISA. We provide recommendations for the future development of the database to support this evolution towards FAIR. Database URL https://data.isa.org.jm/isa/map.

Indexed as

BiodiversityUnited NationsOceans and Seas

Identifiers

PMID36999559
PMCPMC10064262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.