Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36999309›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2023

Childhood predictors of self-harm, externalised violence and transitioning to dual harm in a cohort of adolescents and young adults.

Sarah Steeg, Bushra Farooq, Peter Taylor, Matina Shafti, Becky Mars, Nav Kapur, Roger T Webb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah SteegDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, Centre for Mental Health and Safety, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7935-1414
Bushra FarooqPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Peter TaylorDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, Centre for Mental Health and Safety, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Matina ShaftiDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, Centre for Mental Health and Safety, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Becky MarsCentre for Academic Mental Health, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Nav KapurDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, Centre for Mental Health and Safety, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Roger T WebbDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, Centre for Mental Health and Safety, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Pathways to Alcohol Use Disorders in ALSPAC: A Genetic-Developmental StudyR01AA018333 · NIAAA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI DICK, DANIELLE M, KENDLER, KENNETH SEEDMAN · 2010 to 2014
$2.8M
Medical Research Council G0701594Medical Research Council G9815508Medical Research Council MC_PC_15018Medical Research Council MC_PC_19009NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA018333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aetiology of dual harm (co-occurring self-harm and violence towards others) is poorly understood because most studies have investigated self-harm and violence separately. We aimed to examine childhood risk factors for self-harm, violence, and dual harm, including the transition from engaging in single harm to dual harm.

methodsData from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, a UK-based birth cohort study, were used to estimate prevalence of self-reported engagement in self-harm, violence, and dual harm at ages 16 and 22 years. Risk ratios were calculated to indicate associations across various self-reported childhood risk factors and risks of single and dual harm, including the transition from single harm at age 16 years to dual harm at age 22.

resultsAt age 16 years, 18.1% of the 4176 cohort members had harmed themselves, 21.1% had engaged in violence towards others and 3.7% reported dual harm. At age 22 the equivalent prevalence estimates increased to 24.2, 25.8 and 6.8%, respectively. Depression and other mental health difficulties, drug and alcohol use, witnessing self-harm and being a victim of, or witnessing, violence were associated with higher risks of transitioning from self-harm or violence at age 16 to dual harm by age 22.

conclusionsPrevalence of dual harm doubled from age 16 to 22 years, highlighting the importance of early identification and intervention during this high-risk period. Several childhood psychosocial risk factors associated specifically with dual harm at age 16 and with the transition to dual harm by age 22 have been identified.

Indexed as

Self-Injurious BehaviorAdolescentAdultChildCohort StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesRisk FactorsViolenceYoung AdultALSPACchildhood adversitydual harmpsychosocial risk factorsself-harmviolence

Identifiers

PMID36999309
PMCPMC10719627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.