ArticleBrain and behavior2023
A morphine reward generalization mouse model based on conditioned place preference and aversion.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A morphine reward generalization mouse model based on conditioned place preference and aversion.Brain and behavior · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConditioned place preference (CPP) is a common behavioral paradigm for studying the association of unconditioned stimulus reward memory with context. Generalization is a flexible memory recall pattern developed on the basis of original memory. Drug-seeking behaviors in substance use disorders (SUDs) exhibit diversity, which we generally attribute to the highly generalized features of SUD memory. However, to date, there are no animal models for SUD generalization studies.
methodsWe design the generalization box (G-box) and the generalization retrieval process based on the conditioned place preference (CPP) model. In the memory retrieval stage, we replaced the conditioning CPP box (T-box) with a generalization box (G-box) to study drug generalization memory. For appearance, the generalized boxes have different angles and numbers of sides compared to the conditioning boxes. For the visual cues, the shapes of the symbols are different (triangle icons for the hexagonal chamber and dot icons for the round chamber), but the orientation information remains the same. To establish CPP generalization, the mice received morphine on the vertical or horizontal side of a conditioning box (T-box) and saline on the other side. Then, after CPP conditioning, the generalization test was performed in a generalization box (G-box: hexagonal chamber and Gr-box: round chamber) 21 days later.
resultsCPP-conditioned mice still displayed a clear preference for similar visual information in the G-box. CPA-conditioned mice behaved similarly to CPP, with mice consistently avoiding similar visual information in the G-box. We further observed that the generalization results are similar using two generalization boxes (G-box and Gr-box).
conclusionIn this study, we succeeded in creating a simple and effective generalization model for morphine reward. The establishment of this model provides a new tool for generalization studies of SUD and therapy in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.