ArticleActa psychiatrica Scandinavica2023
Evaluating the performance of machine learning methods for risk estimation of delirium in patients hospitalized from the emergency department.
Article in Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction Models for In-Hospital Delirium Using Routinely Collected Electronic Health Record Data: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Pooled it
- Delirium detection in the emergency department: A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and screening instruments.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Machine learning based algorithms for virtual early detection and screening of neurodegenerative and neurocognitive disorders: a systematic-review.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Early Diagnosis of Delirium in Geriatric Patients in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Machine learning and artificial intelligence for delirium prediction with Electronic Health Records (EHR): a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Determining the ground truth for the prediction of delirium in adult patients in acute care: a scoping review.JAMIA open · 2025Review
- Delirium risk and mortality in people with pre-existing severe mental illness: a retrospective cohort study using linked datasets in England.Psychological medicine · 2024Article
- Enhancing healthcare access for an older population: The age-friendly emergency department.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Optimizing the Functioning of Emergency Departments; a Systematic Review of Current Solutions.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDelirium is a cerebral dysfunction seen commonly in the acute care setting. It is associated with increased mortality and morbidity and is frequently missed in the emergency department (ED) and inpatient care by clinical gestalt alone. Identifying those at risk of delirium may help prioritize screening and interventions in the hospital setting.
objectiveOur objective was to leverage electronic health records to identify a clinically valuable risk estimation model for prevalent delirium in patients being transferred from the ED to inpatient units.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study to develop and validate a risk model to detect delirium using patient data available from prior visits and ED encounter. Electronic health records were extracted for patients hospitalized from the ED between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2020. Eligible patients were aged 65 or older, admitted to an inpatient unit from the emergency department, and had at least one DOSS assessment or CAM-ICU recorded within 72 h of hospitalization. Six machine learning models were developed to estimate the risk of delirium using clinical variables including demographic features, physiological measurements, medications administered, lab results, and diagnoses.
resultsA total of 28,531 patients met the inclusion criteria with 8057 (28.4%) having a positive delirium screening within the outcome observation period. Machine learning models were compared using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). The gradient boosted machine achieved the best performance with an AUC of 0.839 (95% CI, 0.837-0.841). At a 90% sensitivity threshold, this model achieved a specificity of 53.5% (95% CI 53.0%-54.0%) a positive predictive value of 43.5% (95% CI 43.2%-43.9%), and a negative predictive value of 93.1% (95% CI 93.1%-93.2%). A random forest model and L1-penalized logistic regression also demonstrated notable performance with AUCs of 0.837 (95% CI, 0.835-0.838) and 0.831 (95% CI, 0.830-0.833) respectively.
conclusionThis study demonstrated the use of machine learning algorithms to identify a combination of variables that enables an estimation of risk of positive delirium screens early in hospitalization to develop prevention or management protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.