Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36999191›Full record

ArticleActa psychiatrica Scandinavica2023

Evaluating the performance of machine learning methods for risk estimation of delirium in patients hospitalized from the emergency department.

Brianna Mueller, W Nick Street, Ryan M Carnahan, Sangil Lee

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Enhancing healthcare access for an older population: The age-friendly emergency department.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brianna MuellerTippie College of Business, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
W Nick StreetTippie College of Business, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Ryan M CarnahanDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Sangil LeeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8529-4500
University of Iowa · US

Funding

The University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR002537 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HANSEN, MARLAN R, WINOKUR, PATRICIA · 2018 to 2022
$20.0M
NIDUS III: Advanced-Stage Development and Utilization of the NIDUS Research Infrastructure to Advance Interdisciplinary Aging Research inDeliriumR33AG071744 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI John W. Devlin, Esther Seunghee Oh · 2021 to 2026
$4.7M
Supplement to Network for Investigation of Delirium across the U.S (NIDUS)R24AG054259 · NIA · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI INOUYE, SHARON K. · 2016 to 2020
$4.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002537NIA NIH HHS R24 AG054259NIA NIH HHS R33 AG071744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDelirium is a cerebral dysfunction seen commonly in the acute care setting. It is associated with increased mortality and morbidity and is frequently missed in the emergency department (ED) and inpatient care by clinical gestalt alone. Identifying those at risk of delirium may help prioritize screening and interventions in the hospital setting.

objectiveOur objective was to leverage electronic health records to identify a clinically valuable risk estimation model for prevalent delirium in patients being transferred from the ED to inpatient units.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study to develop and validate a risk model to detect delirium using patient data available from prior visits and ED encounter. Electronic health records were extracted for patients hospitalized from the ED between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2020. Eligible patients were aged 65 or older, admitted to an inpatient unit from the emergency department, and had at least one DOSS assessment or CAM-ICU recorded within 72 h of hospitalization. Six machine learning models were developed to estimate the risk of delirium using clinical variables including demographic features, physiological measurements, medications administered, lab results, and diagnoses.

resultsA total of 28,531 patients met the inclusion criteria with 8057 (28.4%) having a positive delirium screening within the outcome observation period. Machine learning models were compared using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). The gradient boosted machine achieved the best performance with an AUC of 0.839 (95% CI, 0.837-0.841). At a 90% sensitivity threshold, this model achieved a specificity of 53.5% (95% CI 53.0%-54.0%) a positive predictive value of 43.5% (95% CI 43.2%-43.9%), and a negative predictive value of 93.1% (95% CI 93.1%-93.2%). A random forest model and L1-penalized logistic regression also demonstrated notable performance with AUCs of 0.837 (95% CI, 0.835-0.838) and 0.831 (95% CI, 0.830-0.833) respectively.

conclusionThis study demonstrated the use of machine learning algorithms to identify a combination of variables that enables an estimation of risk of positive delirium screens early in hospitalization to develop prevention or management protocols.

Indexed as

DeliriumEmergency Service, HospitalHospitalizationHumansMachine LearningRetrospective Studiesdeliriumemergency departmentrisk estimation

Identifiers

PMID36999191
PMCPMC10147581
OpenAlexW4362459036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.