Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36999116›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Atypical Presentations of Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review of Case Reports.

Imran A Khan, Habib Md R Karim, Chinmaya K Panda, Ghazal Ahmed, Swatishree Nayak

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. An inter-rater reliability study of a modified version of SATS as a prehospital triage tool.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. When Delirium Unmasks a Silent Myocardial Infarction.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Molecular medicine reports · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Clinicopathologic discordance-a not unexpected occurrence.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Imran A KhanCommunity and Family Medicine, Baba Raghav Das Medical College, Gorakhpur, IND.
Habib Md R KarimAnesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Raipur, IND.
Chinmaya K PandaAnesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Raipur, IND.
Ghazal AhmedDermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Deoghar, IND.
Swatishree NayakOphthalmology, Chandulal Chandrakar Memorial Government Medical College, Durg, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a rising incidence of coronary artery diseases and myocardial infarction (MI). Mortality associated with acute MI (AMI) is directly linked to the time to receive treatment and missed diagnoses. Although health professionals are aware of typical AMI presentation, atypical MI is difficult to diagnose, which on the other hand, is likely to have an impact on morbidity and mortality. Therefore, it is prudent to know such atypical presentations, especially for emergency and primary care physicians. We aimed to systematically evaluate the clinical presentations of atypical MI and analyze them to characterize the common clinical presentations of atypical MI. We researched the PubMed database, did citation tracking, and performed Google Scholar advanced search to find the cases reported on the atypical presentation of MI published from January 2000 to September 2022. Articles of all languages were included; Google Translate was used to translate articles published in languages other than English. A total of 496 (56 PubMed articles, 340 citations from included PubMed articles, and 100 articles from Google Scholar advanced search) were screened; 52 case reports were evaluated, and their data were analyzed. Atypical presentations of myocardial infarction are vast; patients may have chest pain without typical characteristics of angina pain or may not have chest pain. No typical characterization could be done. Most patients were in their fifth decade or above of their life and commonly presented with pain and discomfort in the abdomen, head, and neck regions. Prodromal symptoms were consistent findings, and many patients had two to three comorbidities out of four common comorbidities, i.e., diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and substance abuse. A patient who is 50 years old or more, having comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, history of tobacco or marijuana usage, presenting with prodromal symptoms like shortness of breath, dizziness, fatigue, syncope, gastrointestinal discomfort or head/neck pain should be suspected for atypical MI.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromeacute ischemic heart diseaseacute myocardial infarctionatypical presentation of myocardial ischemiaclinical features of myocardial ischemiaemergency medical serviceprimary care medicine

Identifiers

PMID36999116
PMCPMC10048062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read55
measurements read18
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.