Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36999018›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in immunology2023

Impact of homologous and heterologous boosters in neutralizing antibodies titers against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron in solid-organ transplant recipients.

Aracelly Gaete-Argel, Vicente Saavedra-Alarcón, Denis Sauré, Luis Alonso-Palomares, Mónica L Acevedo, Marion Alarcón, Susan M Bueno, Alexis M Kalergis, Ricardo Soto-Rifo, Fernando Valiente-Echeverría and 1 more

Open access · goldFull text readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Aracelly Gaete-ArgelLaboratorio de Virología Molecular y Celular, Programa de Virología, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Vicente Saavedra-AlarcónLaboratorio de Virología Molecular y Celular, Programa de Virología, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Denis SauréDepartamento de Ingenieria Industrial, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas, University of Chile and Institutos Sistemas Complejos de Ingenieria, Santiago, Chile.
Luis Alonso-PalomaresLaboratorio de Virología Molecular y Celular, Programa de Virología, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Mónica L AcevedoLaboratorio de Virología Molecular y Celular, Programa de Virología, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Marion AlarcónClínica Santa María, Santiago, Chile.
Susan M BuenoMillennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Santiago, Chile.
Alexis M KalergisMillennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Santiago, Chile.
Ricardo Soto-RifoLaboratorio de Virología Molecular y Celular, Programa de Virología, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Fernando Valiente-EcheverríaLaboratorio de Virología Molecular y Celular, Programa de Virología, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Claudia P CortesMillennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Santiago, Chile.
University of Chile · CLMillennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy · CLClinica Santa Maria · CLComplex Engineering System Institute · CLPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Booster doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines improve seroconversion rates in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) but the impact of homologous and heterologous booster doses in neutralizing antibody (NAb) titers and their ability to interfere with the variant of concern Omicron are not well studied. Methods: We designed a prospective, open-label, observational clinical cohort study. 45 participants received two doses of BNT162b2 or CoronaVac (21-day or 28-day intervals, respectively) followed by a first and second booster with BNT162b2 (5-month apart each) and we analyzed the neutralizing antibody titers against SARSCoV-2 D614G (B.1 lineage) and Omicron (BA.1 lineage). Results: Our results show that SOTRs receiving an initial two-dose scheme of CoronaVac or BNT162b2 generate lower NAbs titers against the ancestral variant of SARS-CoV-2 when compared with healthy controls. Although these NAb titers were further decreased against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron, a single BNT162b2 booster in both groups was sufficient to increase NAb titers against the variant of concern. More importantly, this effect was only observed in those participants responding to the first two shots but not in those not responding to the initial vaccination scheme. Discussion: The data provided here demonstrate the importance of monitoring antibody responses in immunocompromised subjects when planning booster vaccination programs in this risk group.

Indexed as

COVID-19Organ TransplantationAntibodies, NeutralizingBNT162 VaccineCohort StudiesCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Vaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, NeutralizingBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 Vaccinessinovac COVID-19 vaccineVaccines, InactivatedCOVID-19humoral responseneutralizationorgan transplantationvaccine

Identifiers

PMID36999018
PMCPMC10044136
OpenAlexW4324079843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read35
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.