Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36998953›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of clinical cases2023

Endoscopic transluminal drainage and necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: Progress and challenges.

Yan Zeng, Jian Yang, Jun-Wen Zhang

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of clinical cases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07307248 (A Randomized Controlled Trial To Evaluate Early), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07307248 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Trial To Evaluate Early (2-Week) vs. Standard (4-Week) Metal Stent Removal Following Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided WON Drainage.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAsian Institute of Gastroenterology, IndiaRan2025 to 2028Enrolled408ConditionsWalled Off NecrosisArmsStandard LAMS Removal with Double-Pigtail Plastic Stent, Standard LAMS Removal without DPT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yan ZengDepartment of Psychology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China.
Jian YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China. yangjian@hospital.cqmu.edu.cn.
Jun-Wen ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infected necrotizing pancreatitis (INP) represents a severe condition in patients with acute pancreatitis. Invasive interventions are recommended in symptomatic INP. Growing evidence has suggested interventional strategies of INP evolving from traditional surgery to minimally invasive step-up endoscopic procedures. However, there is still no standardized protocol for endoscopic interventions. Recently, various studies have been published about the endoscopic management of INP. This article reviews published articles and guidelines to present the progress and challenges of endoscopic transluminal drainage and necrosectomy in INP.

Indexed as

ChallengeDrainageEndoscopicInfected necrotizing pancreatitisNecrosectomyProgress

Identifiers

PMID36998953
PMCPMC10044952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.