Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36998921›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2022

Isolation of brightness induction effects on target patches from adjacent surrounds and remote backgrounds.

Barbara Blakeslee, Mark E McCourt

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Barbara BlakesleeCenter for Visual and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States.
Mark E McCourtCenter for Visual and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States.

Funding

Center for Visual and Cognitive NeuroscienceP20GM103505 · NIGMS · NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCOURT, MARK E. · 2012 to 2014
$6.3M
Spatial &Temporal Interactions in Brightness PerceptionR01EY014015 · NEI · NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BLAKESLEE, BARBARA · 2003 to 2006
$691k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014015NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brightness (perceived intensity) of a region of visual space depends on its luminance and on the luminance of nearby regions. This phenomenon is called brightness induction and includes both brightness contrast and assimilation. Historically, and on a purely descriptive level, brightness contrast refers to a directional shift in target brightness away from the brightness of an adjacent region while assimilation refers to a brightness shift toward that of an adjacent region. In order to understand mechanisms, it is important to differentiate the descriptive terms contrast and assimilation from the optical and/or neural processes, often similarly named, which cause the effects. Experiment 1 isolated the effect on target patch (64 cd/m

Indexed as

achromatic perceptionbrightness assimilationbrightness contrastbrightness inductionbrightness mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID36998921
PMCPMC10043223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read11
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.