ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023
Case report: Delayed outflow obstruction of a DVA: A rare complication of brainstem cavernoma surgery.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microsurgical resection of quadrigeminal cavernoma and preservation of developmental venous anomaly through a subtemporal approach.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- Detection of cerebral cavernous malformation associated developmental venous anomalies in gradient-echo and susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: can we skip the contrast?Neuroradiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Developmental venous anomalies (DVAs) are considered variants of normal transmedullary veins. Their association with cavernous malformations is reported to increase the risk of hemorrhage. Expert consensus recommends meticulous planning with MR imaging, use of anatomical "safe zones", intraoperative monitoring of long tracts and cranial nerve nuclei, and preservation of the DVA as key to avoiding complications in brainstem cavernoma microsurgery. Symptomatic outflow restriction of DVA is rare, with the few reported cases in the literature restricted to DVAs in the supratentorial compartment. Case: We present a case report of the resection of a pontine cavernoma complicated by delayed outflow obstruction of the associated DVA. A female patient in her 20's presented with progressive left-sided hemisensory disturbance and mild hemiparesis. MRI revealed two pontine cavernomas associated with interconnected DVA and hematoma. The symptomatic cavernoma was resected Conclusion: Delayed symptomatic pontine venous congestive edema is extremely rare following cavernoma surgery. DVA outflow restriction from a post-operative cavity, intraoperative manipulation, and intrinsic hypercoagulability from COVID-10 infection are potential pathophysiological factors. Improved knowledge of DVAs, brainstem venous anatomy, and "safe entry zones" will further elucidate the etiology of and the efficacious treatment for this complication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.