Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36998741›Full record

ArticlePsychology research and behavior management2023

The Relationship Between Psychological Flexibility and Depression, Anxiety and Stress: A Latent Profile Analysis.

Jing Wang, Shuanghu Fang, Chunying Yang, Xiaobin Tang, Luosha Zhu, Yu Nie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology research and behavior management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jing WangSchool of Educational Science, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6703-8124
Shuanghu FangSchool of Educational Science, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, People's Republic of China.
Chunying YangSchool of Special Education, Zhengzhou Normal University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-6482-8531
Xiaobin TangSchool of Marxism, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, People's Republic of China.
Luosha ZhuSchool of Marxism, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-9666-7891
Yu NieOffice of Student Affairs, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the potential classification of psychological flexibility (PF) among Chinese college students, analyze whether there is group heterogeneity in PF, and discuss the differences in the latent profile of PF in the negative emotions of depression, anxiety, and stress. Methods: A total of 1769 college students were investigated using the Psychological Flexibility Questionnaire and Depression-Anxiety-Stress Self-rating Scale, and heterogeneity was tested by latent profile analysis. Results: The PF of college students can be divided into three latent profiles: self-contradiction group (19.2%), high PF group (34.1%), and low PF group (46.7%). The scores of depression, anxiety, and stress are significantly different among the groups. Conclusion: There is obvious group heterogeneity in the PF of college students, and they can be divided into the self-contradiction group, the high PF group, and the low PF group. The self-contradiction and low PF groups score significantly higher on the negative emotions of depression, anxiety, and stress than the high PF group.

Indexed as

acceptance and commitment therapylatent profile analysisnegative emotionspsychological flexibility

Identifiers

PMID36998741
PMCPMC10044140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.