Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36998680›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Towards grapevine root architectural models to adapt viticulture to drought.

Lukas Fichtl, Marco Hofmann, Katrin Kahlen, Kai P Voss-Fels, Clément Saint Cast, Nathalie Ollat, Philippe Vivin, Simone Loose, Mariem Nsibi, Joachim Schmid and 4 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Improving Primary Healthcare: Applying Grapevine (Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lukas FichtlDepartment of General and Organic Viticulture, Hochschule Geisenheim University, Geisenheim, Germany.
Marco HofmannDepartment of General and Organic Viticulture, Hochschule Geisenheim University, Geisenheim, Germany.
Katrin KahlenDepartment of Modeling and Systems Analysis, Hochschule Geisenheim University, Geisenheim, Germany.
Kai P Voss-FelsDepartment of Grapevine Breeding, Hochschule Geisenheim University, Geisenheim, Germany.
Clément Saint CastEGFV, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, INRAE, ISVV, Villenave d'Ornon, France.
Nathalie OllatEGFV, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, INRAE, ISVV, Villenave d'Ornon, France.
Philippe VivinEGFV, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, INRAE, ISVV, Villenave d'Ornon, France.
Simone LooseDepartment of Wine and Beverage Business, Hochschule Geisenheim University, Geisenheim, Germany.
Mariem NsibiDepartment of Grapevine Breeding, Hochschule Geisenheim University, Geisenheim, Germany.
Joachim SchmidDepartment of Grapevine Breeding, Hochschule Geisenheim University, Geisenheim, Germany.
Timo StrackDepartment of Grapevine Breeding, Hochschule Geisenheim University, Geisenheim, Germany.
Hans Reiner SchultzDepartment of General and Organic Viticulture, Hochschule Geisenheim University, Geisenheim, Germany.
Jason SmithGulbali Institute for Agriculture, Water and Environment, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW, Australia.
Matthias FriedelDepartment of General and Organic Viticulture, Hochschule Geisenheim University, Geisenheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To sustainably adapt viticultural production to drought, the planting of rootstock genotypes adapted to a changing climate is a promising means. Rootstocks contribute to the regulation of scion vigor and water consumption, modulate scion phenological development and determine resource availability by root system architecture development. There is, however, a lack of knowledge on spatio-temporal root system development of rootstock genotypes and its interactions with environment and management that prevents efficient knowledge transfer into practice. Hence, winegrowers take only limited advantage of the large variability of existing rootstock genotypes. Models of vineyard water balance combined with root architectural models, using both static and dynamic representations of the root system, seem promising tools to match rootstock genotypes to frequently occurring future drought stress scenarios and address scientific knowledge gaps. In this perspective, we discuss how current developments in vineyard water balance modeling may provide the background for a better understanding of the interplay of rootstock genotypes, environment and management. We argue that root architecture traits are key drivers of this interplay, but our knowledge on rootstock architectures in the field remains limited both qualitatively and quantitatively. We propose phenotyping methods to help close current knowledge gaps and discuss approaches to integrate phenotyping data into different models to advance our understanding of rootstock x environment x management interactions and predict rootstock genotype performance in a changing climate. This could also provide a valuable basis for optimizing breeding efforts to develop new grapevine rootstock cultivars with optimal trait configurations for future growing conditions.

Indexed as

plant architectureroot phenotypesstresssustainabilityvineyardwater

Identifiers

PMID36998680
PMCPMC10043487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read5
measurements read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.