Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36998638›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2023

Characterization and pathogenicity evaluation of recombinant novel duck reovirus isolated from Southeast China.

Huihu Yang, Wandi Zhang, Meihong Wang, Sheng Yuan, Xuelian Zhang, Feng Wen, Jinyue Guo, Kun Mei, Shujian Huang, Zhili Li

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Update on Reovirus Infections in Waterfowls.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Huihu YangCollege of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Wandi ZhangNanyang Vocational College of Agriculture, Nanyang, China.
Meihong WangCollege of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Sheng YuanCollege of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Xuelian ZhangCollege of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Feng WenCollege of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Jinyue GuoCollege of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Kun MeiCollege of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Shujian HuangCollege of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Zhili LiCollege of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Foshan University · CNNanyang Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The novel duck reovirus (NDRV) emerged in southeast China in 2005. The virus causes severe liver and spleen hemorrhage and necrosis in various duck species, bringing serious harm to waterfowl farming. In this study, three strains of NDRV designated as NDRV-ZSS-FJ20, NDRV-LRS-GD20, and NDRV-FJ19 were isolated from diseased Muscovy ducks in Guangdong and Fujian provinces. Pairwise sequence comparisons revealed that the three strains were closely related to NDRV, with nucleotide sequence identities for 10 genomic fragments ranging between 84.8 and 99.8%. In contrast, the nucleotide sequences of the three strains were only 38.9-80.9% similar to the chicken-origin reovirus and only 37.6-98.9% similar to the classical waterfowl-origin reovirus. Similarly, phylogenetic analysis revealed that the three strains clustered together with NDRV and were significantly different from classical waterfowl-origin reovirus and chicken-origin reovirus. In addition, the analyses showed that the L1 segment of the NDRV-FJ19 strain was a recombinant of 03G and J18 strains. Experimental reproduction of the disease showed that the NDRV-FJ19 strain was pathogenic to both ducks and chickens and could lead to symptoms of hemorrhage and necrosis in the liver and spleen. This was somewhat different from previous reports that NDRV is less pathogenic to chickens. In conclusion, we speculated that the NDRV-FJ19 causing duck liver and spleen necrosis is a new variant of a duck orthoreovirus that is significantly different in pathogenicity from any previously reported waterfowl-origin orthoreovirus.

Indexed as

complete genomesnovel duck reoviruspathogenicityphylogenetic analysisre-assortment analyses

Identifiers

PMID36998638
PMCPMC10043381
OpenAlexW4324146632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read48
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.