ArticleFrontiers in surgery2023
A novel 3D-printed laryngoscope with integrated working channels for laryngeal surgery.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-Port Transoral Robotic Surgery for Head and Neck Lesions and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Prospective Real-World Case Series From Taiwan.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Exploratory assessment of an endolaryngeal surgical model with a novel hyperangulated 3D printed laryngoscope.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: For the surgical treatment of early-stage laryngeal cancer, the use of transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) has emerged as the gold standard. However, this procedure requires a straight line of sight to the operating field. Therefore, the patient's neck needs to be brought into a hyperextended position. In a considerable number of patients, this is not possible due to anomalies in the cervical spine anatomy or soft tissue scarring, e.g., after radiation. In these cases, adequate visualization of relevant laryngeal structures cannot be ensured using a conventional rigid operating laryngoscope, which may negatively affect the outcome of these patients. Methods: We present a system based on a 3D-printed prototype of a curved laryngoscope with three integrated working channels (sMAC). The curved profile of the sMAC-laryngoscope is specifically adapted to the nonlinear anatomy of the upper airway structures. The central working channel provides access for flexible video endoscope imaging of the operating field while the two remaining channels provide access for flexible instrumentation. In a user study ( Results: All participants of the user study were able to visualize, reach and manipulate the relevant laryngeal landmarks. Reaching those took significantly less time in the second attempt compared to the first one (27.5 s ± 5.2 s vs. 39.7 s ± 16.5 s, Conclusion: Possibly, the proposed system may develop into an alternative treatment option for patients with early-stage laryngeal cancer and restricted mobility of the cervical spine in the future. Further improvements of the system could include finer end effectors and a flexible instrument with a laser cutting tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.