Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36998593›Full record

ArticleNuclear medicine and molecular imaging2023

Voxel-Based Internal Dosimetry for

Keon Min Kim, Min Sun Lee, Min Seok Suh, Gi Jeong Cheon, Jae Sung Lee

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Outcome-driven dosimetry optimization for [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  2. Comparative Dosimetry of Single and HybridDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Design and validation of a deep learning GAN for predictingJournal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Theranostics.Journal of nuclear medicine technology · 2025
    Review
  7. AI in SPECT Imaging: Opportunities and Challenges.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Monte Carlo methods for medical imaging research.Biomedical engineering letters · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Deep transformer-based personalized dosimetry from SPECT/CT images: a hybrid approach for [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Keon Min KimInterdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, 03080 South Korea.
Min Sun LeeEnvironmental Radioactivity Assessment Team, Nuclear Emergency & Environmental Protection Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejeon, 34057 Korea.
Min Seok SuhDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080 South Korea.
Gi Jeong CheonDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080 South Korea.
Jae Sung LeeInterdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, 03080 South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7623-053X
New Generation University College · ETSeoul National University · KRKorea Atomic Energy Research Institute · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, we propose a deep learning (DL)-based voxel-based dosimetry method in which dose maps acquired using the multiple voxel S-value (VSV) approach were used for residual learning. Methods: Twenty-two SPECT/CT datasets from seven patients who underwent Results: The DL approach provided a slightly more accurate estimation than the multiple-VSV approach, but the results were not statistically significant. The single-VSV approach yielded a relatively inaccurate estimation. No significant difference was noted between the multiple VSV and DL approach on the dose maps. However, this difference was prominent in the error maps. The multiple VSV and DL approach showed a similar correlation. In contrast, the multiple VSV approach underestimated doses in the low-dose range, but it accounted for the underestimation when the DL approach was applied. Conclusion: Dose estimation using the deep learning-based approach was approximately equal to that in the MC simulation. Accordingly, the proposed deep learning network is useful for accurate and fast dosimetry after radiation therapy using

Indexed as

3D U-netDeep learningDose kernelMonte Carlo simulationRadiation dosimetryRadionuclide therapy

Identifiers

PMID36998593
PMCPMC10043146
OpenAlexW4294032551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.