ArticleNuclear medicine and molecular imaging2023
Alzheimer's Disease Prediction Using Attention Mechanism with Dual-Phase
Article in Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multimodal MRI accurately identifies amyloid status in unbalanced cohorts in Alzheimer's disease continuum.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- A comprehensive review on Compton camera image reconstruction: from principles to AI innovations.Biomedical engineering letters · 2024Review
- Accurate Automated Quantification of Dopamine Transporter PET Without MRI Using Deep Learning-based Spatial Normalization.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Clinical Performance Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Amyloid Brain PET Quantification Method.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Amyloid-beta (Aβ) imaging test plays an important role in the early diagnosis and research of biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD) but a single test may produce Aβ-negative AD or Aβ-positive cognitively normal (CN). In this study, we aimed to distinguish AD from CN with dual-phase Materials and Methods: A total of 264 patients (74 CN and 190 AD), who underwent FBB imaging test and neuropsychological tests, were retrospectively analyzed. Early- and delay-phase FBB images were spatially normalized with an in-house FBB template. The regional standard uptake value ratios were calculated with the cerebellar region as a reference region and used as independent variables that predict the diagnostic label assigned to the raw image. Results: AD positivity scores estimated from dual-phase FBB showed better accuracy (ACC) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for AD detection (ACC: 0.858, AUROC: 0.831) than those from delay phase FBB imaging (ACC: 0.821, AUROC: 0.794). AD positivity score estimated by dual-phase FBB (R: -0.5412) shows a higher correlation with psychological test compared to only dFBB (R: -0.2975). In the relevance analysis, we observed that LSTM uses different time and regions of early-phase FBB for each disease group for AD detection. Conclusions: These results show that the aggregated model with dual-phase FBB with long short-term memory and attention mechanism can be used to provide a more accurate AD positivity score, which shows a closer association with AD, than the prediction with only a single phase FBB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.