Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36998568›Full record

ArticleOTO open

Trends in Swallowing Outcomes Following Deintensified Treatment in Selected p16+ Oropharyngeal Carcinoma.

Esther Lee, Hari Magge, Isabel Park, Leyn Shakhtour, Ning-Wei Li, Jennifer Schottler, Arjun S Joshi, Punam G Thakkar, Joseph F Goodman

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Esther LeeDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences Washington District of Columbia USA.
Hari MaggeDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences Washington District of Columbia USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7533-816X
Isabel ParkDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences Washington District of Columbia USA.
Leyn ShakhtourDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences Washington District of Columbia USA.
Ning-Wei LiDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences Washington District of Columbia USA.
Jennifer SchottlerDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences Washington District of Columbia USA.
Arjun S JoshiDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences Washington District of Columbia USA.
Punam G ThakkarDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences Washington District of Columbia USA.
Joseph F GoodmanDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences Washington District of Columbia USA.
George Washington University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Identify trends in swallowing outcomes in p16+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy+surgery (NAC+S) versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy+surgery+radiation (NAC+S+R). Study Design: Cohort study. Setting: Single academic institution. Methods: Swallowing outcome was measured using a validated questionnaire, MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI). MDADI scores were compared between NAC+S and NAC+S+R groups in short-term (<1 year), middle-term (1-3 years), and long-term (>3 years). Clinical factors associated with MDADI scores were explored using a linear mixed model. Statistical significance was established at Results: Sixty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria and were divided into 2 groups: NAC+S (57 [85.1%]) and NAC+S+R (10 [14.9%]). All patients had improved MDADI scores in the middle-term compared to short-term (NAC+S: score increase = 3.43, Conclusion: Regardless of treatment type, swallowing will likely be improved in the middle-term and long-term compared to the short-term. Patients treated with NAC+S+R will have worse short-term swallowing function. However, in the middle-term and long-term, there is no significant difference in swallowing function between patients treated with NAC+S and NAC+S+R.

Indexed as

MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventoryoropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomaradiationswallowingtransoral robotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID36998568
PMCPMC10046713
OpenAlexW4360918317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read46
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.