ArticleOTO open
Clinical Characteristics of the Cervical Inlet Patch: A Case Series.
Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of fully circumferential inlet patches (heterotopic gastric mucosa): More complicated than regular inlet patches.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Personalized Treatments Based on Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patient Profiles: A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The goal of this study was to characterize the symptoms and outcomes of patients with a symptomatic cervical inlet patch (CIP). Study Design: Retrospective case series. Setting: Tertiary care laryngology clinic in Charlottesville, Virginia. Methods: A retrospective chart review of the patient's demographics, comorbidities, prior workup, interventions, and response to treatment was performed. All patients received flexible nasolaryngoscopy and barium swallow study. The analysis was descriptive. Results: Eight patients (6 female) were followed for the management of symptoms related to CIP. The mean age at presentation to our clinic was 64.9 (standard deviation = 15.7). Five out of 8 patients presented with a chief complaint of dysphagia, and the remaining 3 with chronic coughs. Five out of 8 patients demonstrated findings of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) including vocal fold edema, mucosal erythema, or postcricoid edema. Swallow study demonstrated hiatal hernia in 3 of 8 patients, and cricopharyngeal (CP) dysfunction (CP hypertrophy, CP bar, and Zenker's diverticulum) in 3 of 8 patients. One patient presented with a history of Barrett's esophagus. Treatment included increased acid suppression therapy and management of coexisting esophageal pathologies. Ablative procedures were performed in 5 out of 8 cases, with 2 patients requiring repeat procedures. All patients experience subjective symptom improvement. Conclusion: CIP tends to present in complex patients with multifactorial dysphagia, with the most common symptoms being dysphagia and cough. Clinical features of CIP overlap with other more common pathologies encountered by otolaryngologists including LPR and CP dysfunction, and future prospective studies in larger populations should seek to clarify these associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.