Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36998546›Full record

ArticleOTO open

Evaluation of the Impact of Optical Coherence Tomography on Pediatrician Otologic Examination Judgment.

Malinda S Teague, Ryan M Nolan

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Malinda S TeagueHealth of Women, Children, & Families Division Duke University School of Nursing Durham North Carolina USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5488-1152
Ryan M NolanPhotoniCare, Inc. Champaign Illinois USA.
Duke University · USPhotoniCare (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis of otitis media is imperative to judicious antibiotic prescription. Visualization of the tympanic membrane and accurate identification of middle ear effusion with standard otoscopy is inherently challenging in pediatrics, especially in the youngest children who are most at risk for otitis media. With the average diagnostic accuracy among primary care physicians of 50% and accurate identification of normal tympanic membrane versus acute otitis media versus otitis media with effusion ranging from 30% to 84% among pediatricians, there is great opportunity for diagnostic improvement and decreasing unnecessary antibiotic use. In a 96-pediatrician-blinded otoscopy diagnosis quiz, addition of optical coherence tomography, a novel depth-imaging technology, resulted in a 32% improvement in fluid identification, and 21% increase in diagnostic accuracy. This study suggests that the clinical use of this technology promises to improve diagnostic accuracy and antibiotic stewardship in pediatrics.

Indexed as

middle ear effusionoptical coherence tomographyotitis mediaotoscopypediatrics

Identifiers

PMID36998546
PMCPMC10046696
OpenAlexW4322747565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read36
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.