Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36998527›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2023

Pulse Methylprednisolone Versus Dexamethasone in COVID-19: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Atsuyuki Watanabe, Ryota Inokuchi, Toshiki Kuno, Kazuaki Uda, Jun Komiyama, Motohiko Adomi, Yoshiko Ishisaka, Toshikazu Abe, Nanako Tamiya, Masao Iwagami

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Atsuyuki WatanabeDivision of Hospital Medicine, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan.
Ryota InokuchiDepartment of Health Services Research, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Toshiki KunoDivision of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY.
Kazuaki UdaDepartment of Health Services Research, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Jun KomiyamaDepartment of Health Services Research, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Motohiko AdomiDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Yoshiko IshisakaDepartment of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, NY.
Toshikazu AbeDepartment of Health Services Research, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Nanako TamiyaDepartment of Health Services Research, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Masao IwagamiDepartment of Health Services Research, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
University of Tsukuba · JPHarvard University · USMontefiore Medical Center · USMount Sinai Beth Israel · USUniversity of Tsukuba Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although pulse (high-dose) methylprednisolone therapy can hypothetically control immune system flare-ups effectively, the clinical benefit of pulse methylprednisolone compared with dexamethasone in COVID-19 remains inconclusive.

objectivesTo compare pulse methylprednisolone to dexamethasone as a COVID-19 treatment. DESIGN SETTING AND

participantsUsing a Japanese multicenter database, we identified adult patients admitted for COVID-19 and discharged between January 2020 and December 2021 treated with pulse methylprednisolone (250, 500, or 1,000 mg/d) or IV dexamethasone (≥ 6 mg/d) at admission day 0 or 1. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality, new ICU admission, insulin initiation, fungal infection, and readmission. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to differentiate the dose of pulse methylprednisolone (250, 500, or 1,000 mg/d). Additionally, subgroup analyses by characteristics such as the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) were also conducted.

resultsA total of 7,519, 197, 399, and 1,046 patients received dexamethasone, 250, 500, and 1,000 mg/d of methylprednisolone, respectively. The crude in-hospital mortality was 9.3% (702/7,519), 8.6% (17/197), 17.0% (68/399), and 16.2% (169/1,046) for the different doses, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) was 1.26 (0.69-2.29), 1.48 (1.07-2.04), and 1.75 (1.40-2.19) in patients starting 250, 500, and 1,000 mg/d of methylprednisolone, respectively, compared with those starting dexamethasone. In subgroup analyses, the adjusted odds ratio of in-hospital mortality was 0.78 (0.25-2.47), 1.12 (0.55-2.27), and 1.04 (0.68-1.57) in 250, 500, and 1,000 mg/d of methylprednisolone, respectively, among patients with IMV, whereas the adjusted odds ratio was 1.54 (0.77-3.08), 1.62 (1.13-2.34), and 2.14 (1.64-2.80) among patients without IMV. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Higher doses of pulse methylprednisolone (500 or 1,000 mg/d) may be associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes when compared with dexamethasone, especially in patients not on IMV.

Indexed as

COVID-19dexamethasonemethylprednisolonemortalitypulse therapy

Identifiers

PMID36998527
PMCPMC10047604
OpenAlexW4360993344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.