Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36998512›Full record

ArticleOpen life sciences2023

Performance comparison of three scaling algorithms in NMR-based metabolomics analysis.

Xia Liu, Yiqun Fang, Haifeng Ma, Naixia Zhang, Ci Li

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Open life sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xia LiuDepartment of Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, Navy Medical Center, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, 200433, China.
Yiqun FangDepartment of Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, Navy Medical Center, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, 200433, China.
Haifeng MaShanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China.
Naixia ZhangCAS Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, P. R. China.
Ci LiDepartment of Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, Navy Medical Center, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, 200433, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unit variance (UV) scaling, mean centering (CTR) scaling, and Pareto (Par) scaling are three commonly used algorithms in the preprocessing of metabolomics data. Based on our NMR-based metabolomics studies, we found that the clustering identification performances of these three scaling methods were dramatically different as tested by the spectra data of 48 young athletes' urine samples, spleen tissue (from mice), serum (from mice), and cell (from

Indexed as

CTR scalingdiscriminative metabolitesmetabolomicsnuclear magnetic resonancePar scalingUV scaling

Identifiers

PMID36998512
PMCPMC10044292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read14
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.