ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2023
Storage duration of vitrified embryos does not affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after frozen-thawed embryo transfer.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimal timing for frozen-thawed embryo transfer: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of prolonged embryo storage on reproductive and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Pooled it
- The effect of embryo vitrification duration on frozen-thawed transfer outcomes: the key moderating role of age-a retrospective cohort study of 13,054 cycles.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Effects of prolonged embryo cryopreservation after fertility treatment in Denmark.Reproduction & fertility · 2026Article
- Does Prolonged Preservation of Blastocysts Affect the Implantation and Live Birth Rate? A Danish Nationwide Register-Based Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Cryopreservation duration does not affect pregnancy or neonatal outcomes in single high-quality blastocyst transfers: a multicenter retrospective study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Impact of post-vitrification storage duration on clinical outcomes of frozen-thawed cleavage-stage embryos transfer: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Effect of cryopreservation duration on pregnancy outcomes in embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Human reproduction open · 2026Review
- Impact of PGT Introduction on IVF Laboratory Workload: Lessons Learned from a Single-Center Experience of 5258 Biopsies over a 10-Year Period.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Vitrification preservation of good-quality blastocysts for more than 5 years reduces implantation and live birth rates.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Effect of post-vitrification cryopreservation duration on singleton birth-weight in frozen-thawed blastocysts transfer cycles.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the refinement of cryopreservation technology, the number of frozen-warmed embryo transfer (FET) cycles and cryopreserved embryos has increased rapidly. However, studies investigating the effect of storage duration on pregnancy outcomes after vitrification are limited and their results are controversial. Furthermore, the available studies did not take patients' demographic nor clinical treatment characteristics into account and the cryo-storage duration was short. So this study aimed to explore the effect of storage duration of vitrified warmed embryos on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in patients with good prognosis and long storage duration of vitrified embryos. Methods: This study was a bi-centre, retrospective study including 1037 women undergoing their first FET cycles following a fresh cycle from January 2012 until December 2021. Patients were divided into four storage groups in accordance with the storage duration of transferred embryos (612 patients in group I, with storage duration between 1 and 6 months; 202 patients in group II, with storage duration between 7 and 12 months; 141 patients in group III, with storage duration between 13 and 36 months; and 76 patients in group IV, with storage duration between 37 and 84 months). The pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were compared amongst different storage duration groups. Results: Amongst the different groups, no significant differences were observed in the pregnancy outcomes, including biochemical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and live birth rate. In addition, no evidence of differences amongst different storage duration groups was observed in terms of preterm birth, birth length and low birthweight. Conclusions: The pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of embryos after vitrification were not impaired by storage duration up to 7 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.