Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36998477›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Storage duration of vitrified embryos does not affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after frozen-thawed embryo transfer.

Xuelan Li, Pingping Guo, Christophe Blockeel, Xinning Li, Ling Deng, Jie Yang, Chujun Li, Min Lin, Haocun Wu, Guifeng Cai and 2 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xuelan LiReproductive Medicine Center, Shunde Hospital of Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde), Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Pingping GuoReproductive Medicine Center, Zhuhai Maternal and Childcare Service Center, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China.
Christophe BlockeelCentre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Xinning LiReproductive Medicine Center, Shunde Hospital of Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde), Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Ling DengReproductive Medicine Center, Shunde Hospital of Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde), Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Jie YangReproductive Medicine Center, Shunde Hospital of Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde), Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Chujun LiReproductive Medicine Center, Shunde Hospital of Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde), Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Min LinReproductive Medicine Center, Shunde Hospital of Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde), Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Haocun WuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Shunde Hospital of Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde), Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Guifeng CaiReproductive Medicine Center, Zhuhai Maternal and Childcare Service Center, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China.
Yunzhao HuReproductive Medicine Center, Shunde Hospital of Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde), Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Xin ChenReproductive Medicine Center, Shunde Hospital of Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde), Foshan, Guangdong, China.
The First People's Hospital of Shunde · CNWeihai Maternal and Child Health Hospital · CNVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: With the refinement of cryopreservation technology, the number of frozen-warmed embryo transfer (FET) cycles and cryopreserved embryos has increased rapidly. However, studies investigating the effect of storage duration on pregnancy outcomes after vitrification are limited and their results are controversial. Furthermore, the available studies did not take patients' demographic nor clinical treatment characteristics into account and the cryo-storage duration was short. So this study aimed to explore the effect of storage duration of vitrified warmed embryos on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in patients with good prognosis and long storage duration of vitrified embryos. Methods: This study was a bi-centre, retrospective study including 1037 women undergoing their first FET cycles following a fresh cycle from January 2012 until December 2021. Patients were divided into four storage groups in accordance with the storage duration of transferred embryos (612 patients in group I, with storage duration between 1 and 6 months; 202 patients in group II, with storage duration between 7 and 12 months; 141 patients in group III, with storage duration between 13 and 36 months; and 76 patients in group IV, with storage duration between 37 and 84 months). The pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were compared amongst different storage duration groups. Results: Amongst the different groups, no significant differences were observed in the pregnancy outcomes, including biochemical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and live birth rate. In addition, no evidence of differences amongst different storage duration groups was observed in terms of preterm birth, birth length and low birthweight. Conclusions: The pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of embryos after vitrification were not impaired by storage duration up to 7 years.

Indexed as

Premature BirthCryopreservationEmbryo TransferFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyRetrospective StudiesVitrificationcryopreservationfrozen embryo transferpregnancy outcomesstorage timevitrification

Identifiers

PMID36998477
PMCPMC10043480
OpenAlexW4324145862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read156
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.