SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2023
Pharmacological management of cherubism: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The use of denosumab in rare bone diseases in adults: a systematic review from the ECTS Rare Bone Disease Action Group.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Pooled it
- Exploring a cherubism bone phenotype outside the craniofacial region.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Cherubism, emphasizing diagnosis, therapeutic management strategies, and outcomes: a case series.Journal of medical case reports · 2026Article
- Cherubism: An African-Focused Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Outcomes of surgical, medication and combination therapies for cherubism: a systematic review and qualitative analysis.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Review
- Article
- Cherubism in a 4-Year-Old Boy: A Clinical, Radiological, and Genetic Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2025Article
- The bone phenotype associated with cherubism is independent of Caspase-1-dependent inflammasome activation in the mouse.PloS one · 2025Article
- Thoughts on the Etiology of Cherubism.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to determine if there exists an efficacious drug treatment for cherubism, based on published studies. Methods: This systematic review included observational case studies reporting pharmacological management of cherubism. We developed specific search strategies for PubMed (including Medline), ScienceDirect, Web of Science. We evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies using criteria from the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tools. Results: Among the 621 studies initially identified by our search script, 14 were selected for inclusion, of which five were classified as having a low risk of bias, four as having an unclear risk, and five a high risk. Overall, 18 cherubism patients were treated. The sample size in each case study ranged from one to three subjects. This review identified three types of drugs used for cherubism management: calcitonin, immunomodulators and anti-resorptive agents. However, the high heterogeneity in case reports and the lack of standardized outcomes precluded a definitive conclusion regarding the efficacy of any treatment for cherubism. Conclusions: The present systematic review could not identify an effective treatment for cherubism due to the heterogeneity and limitations of the included studies. However, in response to these shortcomings, we devised a checklist of items that we recommend authors consider in order to standardize the reporting of cherubism cases and specifically when a treatment is given toward identification of an efficacious cherubism therapy. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022351044, identifier CRD42022351044.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.