Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36998450›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans using deep autoencoder networks.

Peng Huang, Jiawen Shang, Yingjie Xu, Zhihui Hu, Ke Zhang, Jianrong Dai, Hui Yan

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Principles of artificial intelligence in radiooncology.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peng HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jiawen ShangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yingjie XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zhihui HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ke ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jianrong DaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Hui YanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Treatment plans are used for patients under radiotherapy in clinics. Before execution, these plans are checked for safety and quality by human experts. A few of them were identified with flaws and needed further improvement. To automate this checking process, an unsupervised learning method based on an autoencoder was proposed. Methods: First, features were extracted from the treatment plan by human experts. Then, these features were assembled and used for model learning. After network optimization, a reconstruction error between the predicted and target signals was obtained. Finally, the questionable plans were identified based on the value of the reconstruction error. A large value of the reconstruction error indicates a longer distance from the standard distribution of normal plans. A total of 576 treatment plans for breast cancer patients were used for the test. Among them, 19 were questionable plans identified by human experts. To evaluate the performance of the autoencoder, it was compared with four baseline detection algorithms, namely, local outlier factor (LOF), hierarchical density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (HDBSCAN), one-class support vector machine (OC-SVM), and principal component analysis (PCA). Results: The results showed that the autoencoder achieved the best performance than the other four baseline algorithms. The AUC value of the autoencoder was 0.9985, while the second one was 0.9535 (LOF). While maintaining 100% recall, the average accuracy and precision of the results by the autoencoder were 0.9658 and 0.5143, respectively. While maintaining 100% recall, the average accuracy and precision of the results by LOF were 0.8090 and 0.1472, respectively. Conclusion: The autoencoder can effectively identify questionable plans from a large group of normal plans. There is no need to label the data and prepare the training data for model learning. The autoencoder provides an effective way to carry out an automatic plan checking in radiotherapy.

Indexed as

autoencoderdetectionradiotherapytreatment planunsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID36998450
PMCPMC10043249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read6
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.