Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36998435›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Impact of lenvatinib-induced proteinuria and renal dysfunction in patients with thyroid cancer.

Yuma Shibutani, Shinya Suzuki, Atsunobu Sagara, Tomohiro Enokida, Susumu Okano, Takao Fujisawa, Fumiaki Sato, Tetsuro Yumoto, Motohiko Sano, Toshikatsu Kawasaki and 1 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Drug-related proteinuria: a vigilance analysis based on the FAERS database.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuma ShibutaniDepartment of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Shinya SuzukiDepartment of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Atsunobu SagaraHoshi University School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomohiro EnokidaDepartment of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Susumu OkanoDepartment of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Takao FujisawaDepartment of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Fumiaki SatoHoshi University School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuro YumotoHoshi University School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan.
Motohiko SanoHoshi University School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshikatsu KawasakiDepartment of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Makoto TaharaDepartment of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Hoshi University · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Proteinuria is the most frequent adverse event of lenvatinib use. However, the association between lenvatinib-induced proteinuria and renal dysfunction remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with thyroid cancer without proteinuria treated with lenvatinib as a first-line systemic therapy at the initiation of treatment to assess the association between lenvatinib-induced proteinuria and renal function and the risk factors for the development of ≥3+ proteinuria on a dipstick test. Proteinuria was assessed by the dipstick test throughout the treatment in all cases. Results: Of the 76 patients, 39 developed ≤2+ proteinuria (low proteinuria group) and 37 developed ≥3+ proteinuria (high proteinuria group). There was no significant difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between high and low proteinuria groups at each time point, but there was a trend toward a significant decrease in eGFR of -9.3 ml/min/1.73 m Conclusions: There was no association between the degree of lenvatinib-induced proteinuria and renal function. Therefore, treatment should be continued with attention to renal function, regardless of the degree of proteinuria.

Indexed as

lenvatinibproteinuriarenal dysfunctionthyroid cancerVEGF inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID36998435
PMCPMC10043443
OpenAlexW4324147318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read24
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.