Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36998424›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2023

Clinical impact of artificial intelligence-based solutions on imaging of the pancreas and liver.

M Alvaro Berbís, Felix Paulano Godino, Javier Royuela Del Val, Lidia Alcalá Mata, Antonio Luna

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Imaging: A Systematic Review.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M Alvaro BerbísDepartment of Radiology, HT Médica, San Juan de Dios Hospital, Córdoba 14960, Spain.
Felix Paulano GodinoDepartment of Radiology, HT Médica, Clínica las Nieves, Jaén 23007, Spain.
Javier Royuela Del ValDepartment of Radiology, HT Médica, San Juan de Dios Hospital, Córdoba 14960, Spain.
Lidia Alcalá MataDepartment of Radiology, HT Médica, Clínica las Nieves, Jaén 23007, Spain.
Antonio LunaDepartment of Radiology, HT Médica, Clínica las Nieves, Jaén 23007, Spain. aluna70@htmedica.com.
Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves · ESHospital San Juan de Dios · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has experienced substantial progress over the last ten years in many fields of application, including healthcare. In hepatology and pancreatology, major attention to date has been paid to its application to the assisted or even automated interpretation of radiological images, where AI can generate accurate and reproducible imaging diagnosis, reducing the physicians' workload. AI can provide automatic or semi-automatic segmentation and registration of the liver and pancreatic glands and lesions. Furthermore, using radiomics, AI can introduce new quantitative information which is not visible to the human eye to radiological reports. AI has been applied in the detection and characterization of focal lesions and diffuse diseases of the liver and pancreas, such as neoplasms, chronic hepatic disease, or acute or chronic pancreatitis, among others. These solutions have been applied to different imaging techniques commonly used to diagnose liver and pancreatic diseases, such as ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasonography, computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography/CT. However, AI is also applied in this context to many other relevant steps involved in a comprehensive clinical scenario to manage a gastroenterological patient. AI can also be applied to choose the most convenient test prescription, to improve image quality or accelerate its acquisition, and to predict patient prognosis and treatment response. In this review, we summarize the current evidence on the application of AI to hepatic and pancreatic radiology, not only in regard to the interpretation of images, but also to all the steps involved in the radiological workflow in a broader sense. Lastly, we discuss the challenges and future directions of the clinical application of AI methods.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLiver DiseasesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPancreasArtificial intelligenceDeep learningImagingLiverMachine learningPancreas

Identifiers

PMID36998424
PMCPMC10044858
OpenAlexW4323358563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.