Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36998388›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of orthopedics2023

Utility of D-dimer in total joint arthroplasty.

Brenden Cutter, Zachary C Lum, Mauro Giordani, John P Meehan

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of orthopedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Periprosthetic joint infections: state-of-the-art.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024
    Review
  9. How we manage a high D-dimer.Haematologica · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brenden CutterDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Valley Orthopedic Surgery Residency/Valley Consortium for Medical Education, Modesto, CA 95351, United States. bcutter16@gmail.com.
Zachary C LumDepartment of Orthopaedics, Adult Reconstruction Division, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA 95817, United States.
Mauro GiordaniDepartment of Orthopaedics, Adult Reconstruction Division, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA 95817, United States.
John P MeehanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Adult Reconstruction Division, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA 95817, United States.
University of California Davis Medical Center · USValley Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the number of patients receiving total joint replacements continues to rise, considerable attention has been directed towards the early detection and prevention of postoperative complications. While D-dimer has long been studied as a diagnostic tool in venous thromboembolism (VTE), this assay has recently received considerable attention in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). D-dimer values are substantially elevated in the acute postoperative period after total joint arthroplasty, with levels often exceeding the standard institutional cutoff for VTE (500 µg/L). The utility of D-dimer in detecting VTE after total joint replacement is currently limited, and more research to assess its value in the setting of contemporary prophylaxis protocols is warranted. Recent literature supports D-dimer as a good to excellent biomarker for the diagnosis of chronic PJI, especially when using serum sample technique. Providers should exercise caution when interpreting D-dimer levels in patients with inflammatory and hypercoagulability disorders, as the diagnostic value is decreased. The updated 2018 Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria, which includes D-dimer levels > 860 µg/L as a minor criterion, may be the most accurate for diagnosing chronic PJI to date. Larger prospective trials with transparent lab testing protocols are needed to establish best assay practices and optimal cutoff values for D-dimer in the diagnosis of PJI. This review summarizes the most current literature on the value of D-dimer in total joint arthroplasty and elucidates areas for future progress.

Indexed as

ArthroplastyD-dimerDeep vein thrombosisDiagnosisPeriprosthetic joint infectionVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID36998388
PMCPMC10044320
OpenAlexW4327544299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.