Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36998306›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2023

Primary tracheobronchial necrosis after esophagectomy: A nationwide multicenter retrospective study in Japan.

Makoto Sakai, Hiroshi Saeki, Makoto Sohda, Mizuki Korematsu, Hiroshi Miyata, Daizo Murakami, Yoshifumi Baba, Ryo Ishii, Hiroshi Okamoto, Tomotaka Shibata and 4 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Novel and classic approaches for managing gastrointestinal cancers.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Makoto SakaiDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery, Department of General Surgical Science, Graduate School of Medicine Gunma University Maebashi Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0860-3132
Hiroshi SaekiDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery, Department of General Surgical Science, Graduate School of Medicine Gunma University Maebashi Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7243-6960
Makoto SohdaDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery, Department of General Surgical Science, Graduate School of Medicine Gunma University Maebashi Japan.
Mizuki KorematsuDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery Osaka International Cancer Institute Osaka Japan.
Hiroshi MiyataDepartment of Digestive Surgery Osaka International Cancer Institute Osaka Japan.
Daizo MurakamiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine Kumamoto University Kumamoto Japan.
Yoshifumi BabaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science Kumamoto University Kumamoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3657-2388
Ryo IshiiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine Sendai Japan.
Hiroshi OkamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine Sendai Japan.
Tomotaka ShibataAdvanced Trauma, Emergency and Critical Care Center/Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery Oita University Hospital Yufu Japan.
Ken ShirabeDepartment of General Surgical Science Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine Maebashi Japan.
Yasushi TohNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center Fukuoka Japan.
Akihiro ShiotaniDepartment of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery National Defense Medical College Saitama Japan.
Japan Broncho‐Esophagological Society
Gunma University · JPKumamoto University · JPOsaka International Cancer Institute · JPTohoku University · JPNational Defense Medical College · JPNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center · JPOita University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The clinical features of postoperative primary tracheobronchial necrosis (P-TBN; the necrosis without anastomotic leakage or other cervical and mediastinal abscess) remains unclear. This nationwide multicenter retrospective study first investigated the clinical features of P-TBN after esophagectomy for upper aerodigestive tract cancer with a large cohort. Methods: As a study of the Japan Broncho-Esophagological Society, a nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted in 67 institutions. The clinical data of 6370 patients who underwent esophagectomy for laryngeal, pharyngeal, and esophageal cancer between 2010 and 2019 were collected. Grades of P-TBN were defined as follows: Grade 1, mucosal necrosis; Grade 2, transmural bronchial wall necrosis without fistula or perforation; Grade 3, transmural bronchial wall necrosis with fistula or perforation. Results: P-TBN was observed in 48 (0.75%) of 6370 patients. The incidences of P-TBN for pharyngo-laryngo-cervical esophagectomy (PLCE; n = 1650), total pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy (TPLE; n = 205), and subtotal esophagectomy (SE; n = 4515) were 2.0%, 5.4%, and 0.1%, respectively. The upper mediastinal LN dissection ( Conclusion: The incidence of TBN restricted to P-TBN was lower than previously reported. Maintaining the tracheal blood flow is essential to prevent worsening P-TBN, especially in PLCE and TPLE. Our new P-TBN severity grade may predict the outcome of patients with P-TBN.

Indexed as

esophageal neoplasmsesophagectomylaryngeal neoplasmspharyngeal neoplasmstracheobronchial necrosis

Identifiers

PMID36998306
PMCPMC10043765
OpenAlexW4303646912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read61
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.