Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36998291›Full record

ReviewAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2023

Tumor deposits in colorectal cancer: Refining their definition in the TNM system.

Hideki Ueno, Iris D Nagtegaal, Philip Quirke, Kenichi Sugihara, Yoichi Ajioka

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Hideki UenoDepartment of Surgery National Defense Medical College Saitama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8600-1199
Iris D NagtegaalDepartment of Pathology Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen The Netherlands.
Philip QuirkeDivision of Pathology and Data Analytics University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital Leeds UK.
Kenichi SugiharaDepartment of Surgical Oncology Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences Tokyo Japan.
Yoichi AjiokaDivision of Molecular and Diagnostic Pathology Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences Niigata Japan.
National Defense Medical College · JPNiigata University · JPRadboud University Nijmegen · NLTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor deposits (TDs) are discontinuous tumor spread in the mesocolon/mesorectum which is found in approximately 20% of colorectal cancer (CRC) and negatively affects survival. We have a history of repeated revisions on TD definition and categorization in the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) system leading to stage migration. Since 1997, TDs have been categorized as T or N factors depending on their size (TNM5) or contour (TNM6). In 2009, TNM7 provided the category of N1c for TDs in a case without positive lymph nodes (LNs), which is also used in TNM8. However, increasing evidence suggests that these revisions are suboptimal and only "partially" successful. Specifically, the N1c rule is certainly useful for oncologists who are having difficulty with TDs in a case with no positive LNs. However, it has failed to maximize the value of the TNM system because of the underused prognostic information of individual TDs. Recently, the potential value of an alternative staging method has been highlighted in several studies using the "counting method." For this method, all nodular type TDs are individually counted together with positive LNs to derive the final pN, yielding a prognostic and diagnostic value that is superior to existing TNM systems. The TNM system has long stuck to the origin of TDs in providing its categorization, but it is time to make way for alternative options and initiate an international discussion on optimal treatment of TDs in tumor staging; otherwise, a proportion of patients end up missing an opportunity to receive the optimal adjuvant treatment.

Indexed as

Extramural cancer deposits without lymph node structure (EX)Lymph node metastasisTumor deposits (TDs)Tumor‐node‐metastasis (TNM) systemtumor stage

Identifiers

PMID36998291
PMCPMC10043773
OpenAlexW4319845282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read21
measurements read15
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.