Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36998220›Full record

ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

The Effect of Intervention Approaches of Emotion Regulation and Learning Strategies on Students' Learning and Mental Health.

Elodie Charbonnier, Sarah Le Vigouroux, Cécile Puechlong, Lucile Montalescot, Aurélie Goncalves, Louise Baussard, Beatrice Gisclard, Antony G Philippe, Florence Lespiau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elodie CharbonnierUNIV. NIMES, APSY-V, F-30021 Nîmes Cedex 1, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0225-9564
Sarah Le VigourouxUNIV. NIMES, APSY-V, F-30021 Nîmes Cedex 1, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6655-7376
Cécile PuechlongUNIV. NIMES, APSY-V, F-30021 Nîmes Cedex 1, France.
Lucile MontalescotUNIV. NIMES, APSY-V, F-30021 Nîmes Cedex 1, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8004-4481
Aurélie GoncalvesUNIV. NIMES, APSY-V, F-30021 Nîmes Cedex 1, France.
Louise BaussardUNIV. NIMES, APSY-V, F-30021 Nîmes Cedex 1, France.
Beatrice GisclardUNIV. NIMES, Projekt, F-30021 Nîmes Cedex 1, France.
Antony G PhilippeUNIV. NIMES, APSY-V, F-30021 Nîmes Cedex 1, France.
Florence LespiauUNIV. NIMES, APSY-V, F-30021 Nîmes Cedex 1, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0547-3371
Université de Nîmes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

University students are a vulnerable population, and many recent studies show that anxiety, depressive symptoms, and academic burnout have been on the increase since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings point to a need for interventions to reduce these difficulties. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effects of 2 formats of an innovative program on students' mental health (anxiety, depressive symptoms, and academic burnout), intolerance of uncertainty, learned helplessness, and learning. Our sample was composed of 105 university students, recruited on a voluntary basis. They were divided into 3 groups: online intervention group (n = 36), face-to-face intervention group (n = 32), and control group (n = 37). The following variables were measured through online questionnaires: anxiety and depressive symptoms, academic burnout, intolerance of uncertainty, learned helplessness, perceived social support, learning strategies, and beliefs. There were 2 assessments 10 weeks apart (ie, before and after the program in the case of the 2 intervention groups). We performed nonparametric analyses to run comparisons between the 2 assessment timepoints in each group. Results showed that participants in the 2 intervention groups had lower levels of learned helplessness and intolerance of uncertainty at the end of the program. Furthermore, participants in the face-to-face group reported higher levels of perceived social support, academic self-efficacy, and help-seeking strategies. The present study highlighted the benefits of our innovative program, especially its face-to-face format.

Indexed as

COVID-19Emotional RegulationHumansMental HealthPandemicsStudentsanxietyCOVID-19learningmental healthstudents

Identifiers

PMID36998220
PMCPMC10068999
OpenAlexW4362015354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.