Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36998195›Full record

ReviewmAbs

Trends in industrialization of biotherapeutics: a survey of product characteristics of 89 antibody-based biotherapeutics.

Kyle P Martin, Christine Grimaldi, Rolf Grempler, Steven Hansel, Sandeep Kumar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Kyle P MartinBiotherapeutics Discovery, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceutical Inc, Ridgefield, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6946-4813
Christine GrimaldiDrug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceutical Inc, Ridgefield, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5915-4317
Rolf GremplerClinical Pharmacology, Translational Medicine & Clinical Pharmacology, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceutical Inc, Ridgefield, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9291-4947
Steven HanselBiotherapeutics Discovery, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceutical Inc, Ridgefield, CT, USA.
Sandeep KumarBiotherapeutics Discovery, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceutical Inc, Ridgefield, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2840-6398
Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is considerable interest in the pharmaceutical industry toward development of antibody-based biotherapeutics because they can selectively bind diverse receptors and often possess desirable pharmacology. Here, we studied product characteristics of 89 marketed antibody-based biotherapeutics that were approved from 1986 to mid-2020 by gathering publicly available information. Our analyses revealed major trends in their emergence as the best-selling class of pharmaceuticals. Early on, most therapeutic monoclonal antibodies were developed to treat cancer, with CD20 being the most common target. Thanks to industrialization of antibody manufacturing technologies, their use has now blossomed to include 15 different therapeutic areas and nearly 60 targets, and the field is still growing! Drug manufacturers are solidifying their choices regarding types of antibodies and their molecular formats. IgG1 kappa continues to be the most common molecular format among marketed antibody-based biotherapeutics. Most antibody-based biotherapeutics approved since 2015 are either humanized or fully human, but the data we collected do not show a direct correlation between humanness and reported incidence of anti-drug antibodies. Furthermore, there have also been improvements in terms of drug product stability and high concentration liquid formulations suitable for subcutaneous route of administration, which are being approved more often in recent years. These improvements, however, have not been uniformly adopted across all therapeutic areas, suggesting that multiple options for drug product development are being used to serve diverse therapeutic purposes. Insights gained from this analysis may help us devise better end-to-end antibody-based biotherapeutic drug discovery and development strategies.

Indexed as

Industrial DevelopmentNeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalHumansInjections, SubcutaneousAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodybiotherapeuticsdevelopabilitydrugformulationpharmacology

Identifiers

PMID36998195
PMCPMC10072077
OpenAlexW4362507399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.