Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36998022›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2023

Impact on the ability of healthcare professionals to correctly identify patient-ventilator asynchronies of the simultaneous visualization of estimated muscle pressure curves on the ventilator display: a randomized study (P

Daniel Oliveira Silva, Patrícia Nery de Souza, Mayson Laercio de Araujo Sousa, Caio Cesar Araujo Morais, Juliana Carvalho Ferreira, Marcelo Alcantara Holanda, Wellington Pereira Yamaguti, Laerte Pastore Junior, Eduardo Leite Vieira Costa

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. PVADet: fast patient-ventilator asynchrony detection on waveforms.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel Oliveira Silva *Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Sírio-Libanes, São Paulo, Brazil.
Patrícia Nery de Souza *Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Sírio-Libanes, São Paulo, Brazil. patnerysouza@gmail.com.
Mayson Laercio de Araujo SousaInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Caio Cesar Araujo MoraisUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, UFPE, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Juliana Carvalho FerreiraDisciplina de Pneumologia, Heart Institute (Incor), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelo Alcantara HolandaDepartamento de Medicina Clínica, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Wellington Pereira YamagutiIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Sírio-Libanes, São Paulo, Brazil.
Laerte Pastore JuniorIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Sírio-Libanes, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eduardo Leite Vieira CostaDisciplina de Pneumologia, Heart Institute (Incor), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Hospital Sírio-Libanês · BRHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRSt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Federal do Ceará · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-ventilator asynchronies are usually detected by visual inspection of ventilator waveforms but with low sensitivity, even when performed by experts in the field. Recently, estimation of the inspiratory muscle pressure (P

methodsA prospective single-center randomized study with parallel assignment was conducted to assess whether the display of the estimated P

resultsA total of 98 participants were included, 49 per group. The sensitivity per participant in identifying asynchronies was significantly higher in the P

conclusionsWe showed that the display of the P

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NTC05144607. Retrospectively registered 3 December 2021.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRespiration, ArtificialBrazilDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansMusclesProspective StudiesVentilators, MechanicalArtificial ventilationInteractive ventilatory supportMechanical ventilationRespiratory diaphragmRespiratory failure

Identifiers

PMID36998022
PMCPMC10064577
OpenAlexW4361278812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.