Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36998003›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2023

Culturally adapted family intervention for people with schizophrenia in Indonesia (FUSION): a development and feasibility study protocol.

Laoise Renwick, Herni Susanti, Helen Brooks, Budi-Anna Keliat, Tim Bradshaw, Penny Bee, Karina Lovell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Laoise RenwickDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. laoise.renwick@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7060-4537
Herni SusantiFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.
Helen BrooksDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Budi-Anna KeliatFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.
Tim BradshawDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Penny BeeDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Karina LovellDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
University of Manchester · GBUniversity of Indonesia · IDManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T003987/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental illnesses comprise the single largest source of health-related economic burden globally, and low- and middle-income countries are disproportionately affected. The majority of people with schizophrenia who need treatment do not receive it and are often wholly reliant on family caregivers for daily care and support. Family interventions have an exceptionally robust evidence base for their efficacy in high-resource settings, but it is unknown whether they can produce equivalent effects in some low-resource settings where cultural beliefs, explanatory models of illness and contextual socio-economic issues differ.

methodsThis protocol describes the methods for a randomised controlled trial to determine the feasibility of testing culturally adapt and refine an evidence-based, family intervention for relatives and caregivers of people with schizophrenia in Indonesia. The feasibility and acceptability of implementing our adapted, co-produced intervention via task shifting in primary care settings will be evaluated using the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions. We will recruit 60 carer-service-user dyads and randomise them in a 1:1 ratio either to receive our manualised intervention or continue to receive treatment as usual. Healthcare workers in primary care settings will be trained to deliver family interventions using our manualised intervention by a family intervention specialist. Participants will complete the ECI, IEQ, KAST and GHQ. Service-user symptom level and relapse status will be measured using the PANSS at baseline, post-intervention and 3 months later by trained researchers. Fidelity to the intervention model will be measured using the FIPAS. Qualitative evaluation will further assist with refining the intervention, evaluating trial processes and evaluating acceptability. DISCUSSION: National healthcare policy in Indonesia supports the delivery of mental health services in a complex network of primary care centres. This study will provide important information on the feasibility of delivering family interventions for people with schizophrenia via task shifting in primary care settings in Indonesia and allow further refinement of the intervention and trial processes.

Indexed as

Caregiver burdenComplex intervention developmentCo-productionFamily interventions for psychosisFeasibility studyLow- and middle-income countriesMixed methodsProtocolTask-shifting

Identifiers

PMID36998003
PMCPMC10061709
OpenAlexW4361268057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.