Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36997922›Full record

ReviewBMC complementary medicine and therapies2023

Acceptance and attitude towards the traditional chinese medicine among asymptomatic COVID-19 patients in Shanghai Fangcang hospital.

Bo Pan, Hong-Wei Yin, Yue Yu, Xing Xiang, Cui Yu, Xiao-Jie Yan, Xiao-Feng Zhai, Yuan Bai, Jing Hong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bo Pan *The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Hong-Wei Yin *The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Yue Yu *The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Xing Xiang *School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Cui YuThe First Clinical Medical College, Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210023, China.
Xiao-Jie YanThe First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Xiao-Feng ZhaiThe First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China. zhaixfch@163.com.
Yuan BaiThe First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China. yuanbai@smmu.edu.cn.
Jing HongThe First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China. jinghong@smmu.edu.cn.

Funding

234 Discipline Promotion Foundation of Changhai Hospital 2020YXK010Medical Innovation Research program of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission 22Y11921200Youth Start-up Fund of Changhai Hospital 2020QNB14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has brought severe damage to global health and socioeconomics. In China, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is the most important complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and it has shown a beneficial role in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. However, it is unknown whether patients are willing to accept TCM treatment. The objective of our study is to investigate the acceptance, attitude, and independent predictors of TCM among asymptomatic COVID-19 patients admitted to Shanghai fangcang hospital during the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in Shanghai in 2022.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on asymptomatic COVID-19 patients in the largest fangcang hospital in Shanghai, China, from April 22, 2022, to May 25, 2022. Based on the literature review of previous similar studies, a self-report questionnaire was developed to assess the patients' attitude and acceptance of TCM, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the independent predictors of TCM acceptance.

resultsA total of 1,121 patients completed the survey, of whom 91.35% were willing to accept CAM treatment whereas 8.65% of participants showed no willingness. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the patients who have received two doses of COVID-19 vaccine (OR = 2.069, 95%CI: 1.029-4.162, P = 0.041 vs. not received), understood the culture of TCM (OR = 2.293, 95%CI: 1.029-4.162, P = 0.014 vs. not understood), thought the TCM treatment is safe (OR = 2.856, 95%CI: 1.334-6.112, P = 0.007 vs. not thought), thought the TCM treatment is effective (OR = 2.724, 95%CI: 1.249-5.940, P = 0.012 vs. not thought), and those who informed their attending physician if using TCM for treatment (OR = 3.455, 95%CI:1.867-6.392, P < 0.001 vs. not informed) were more likely to accept TCM treatment. However, patients who thought TCM might delay your treatment (OR = 0.256, 95%CI: 0.142-0.462, P < 0.001 not thought) was an independent predictor for unwillingness to accept TCM treatment.

conclusionThis study preliminarily investigated the acceptance, attitude, and predictors of intention to receive TCM among asymptomatic COVID-19 patients. It is recommended to increase the publicity of TCM, clarify the impact of TCM and communicate with attending doctors that meet the healthcare needs of asymptomatic COVID-19 patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19ChinaCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesHospitalsHumansMedicine, Chinese TraditionalPandemicsCOVID-19 VaccinesAsymptomatic COVID-19 patientsCOVID-19Cross-sectional studyPredictorsTraditional chinese medicine

Identifiers

PMID36997922
PMCPMC10061361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.