ArticleBMC ophthalmology2023
Occult intraocular aluminium foreign body causing rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a case report.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiscale Cortical Remodeling Following Abrupt Visual Deafferentation in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: Imaging Transcriptomics and Neurotransmitter Mapping.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Fibrotic Changes in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOcular trauma is complex and varied, and some occult intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) can lead to uncommon symptoms and signs. We report a case of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (no obvious wound, no pain, no intraocular infection or other symptoms) caused by an occult intraocular aluminium foreign body, which could have been easily missed. CASE PRESENTATION: A 42-year-old male presented to the outpatient department of our hospital complaining of fluttering black dots and decreased vision in his left eye that began 3 months earlier. He was diagnosed with "floaters" at a community hospital. He denied a history of ocular trauma or previous surgery. The cornea and lens of the left eye were clear. A small patch of pigmentation was noted in the temporal sclera. Fundoscopy revealed macula-off retinal detachment. After mydriasis, elliptical holes were seen in the peripheral retina at 2:30, and a suspicious hyperreflective strip was found under the anterior lip of the retina by Goldmann three-mirror contact lens examination; the strip was confirmed to be an IOFB by orbital CT. The IOFB was removed through pars plana vitrectomy without any complications.
conclusionUnlike iron and copper IOFBs, aluminium IOFBs are more inert and more likely to be missed. For people with special occupations (construction workers, mechanics, etc.), when abnormal pigmentation of the sclera is found, the possibility of foreign bodies in the eye should be considered. In the process of disease diagnosis and treatment, it is necessary to ask for a detailed history, including occupation history and practice, and perform careful physical and targeted examinations. Such comprehensive analysis regarding the above information will minimize the chance of missed diagnosis.Awareness of occult IOFB in high risk occupations and prompt referral to a retinal surgeon is of outmost importance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.